William Lavely

1.0k citations
31 papers · 614 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Lavely

30 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

William Lavely
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Gender Studies 354
  • Demography 245
  • Sociology and Political Science 308
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 138
  • Safety Research 39
Replace Tom Fricke with:
Tom Fricke United States
C. Alison McIntosh United States
Alice Goldstein United States
Kenneth Davis Canada
Delia Davin United Kingdom
Kevin McQuillan Canada
Susan De Vos United States
Jan Kok Netherlands
Diane J. Macunovich United States
J. David Hacker United States
William Lavely relative to Tom Fricke United States Tom Fricke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tom Fricke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Lavely

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Lavely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Lavely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Lavely more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Lavely

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Lavely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Lavely. The network helps show where William Lavely may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside William Lavely, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Lavely Line = papers co-authored together William Lavely links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990100
2 200375
3 199069
4 200168
5 199847
6 199246
7 198826
8 200225
9 199023
10 198616
11 199516
12 198411
13 199010
14 19899
15 20079
16 19929
17 19889
18 19778
19 19847
20 19826

About William Lavely

William Lavely is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (19 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (6 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (354 citations), Demography (245 citations), Sociology and Political Science (308 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (138 citations) and Safety Research (39 citations). William Lavely has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Freedman, Jianghong Li, Bohua Li, Xiao Zhenyu, R. Bin Wong, Xinhua S. Ren, Akira Hayami, Feng Wang, James Lee and Stevan Harrell. Their work appears in journals such as Population Studies, The China Quarterly, The Journal of Asian Studies, Asian Survey and Demography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact