Political Science and International Relations17.5k
Anthropology9.1k
Cultural Studies5.8k
Economics and Econometrics4.8k
Replace The Journal of Southern History with:
The Journal of Southern HistoryUnited States
The Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryUnited States
Geographical ReviewUnited States
Political GeographyUnited Kingdom
The William and Mary QuarterlyUnited States
Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersUnited Kingdom
AntipodeUnited States
American EthnologistUnited States
Journal of the American Oriental SocietyUnited States
The International Journal of African Historical StudiesUnited States
The Journal of Southern HistoryUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to The Journal of Asian Studies
The Journal of Asian Studies · 1×
×1.234.0kSPS
×1.017.0kPSIR
×1.08.8kANTHR
×0.95.1kCS
×1.15.5kEE
Citations per year, relative to The Journal of Asian Studies
The Journal of Asian Studies · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Asian Studies
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Asian Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Journal of Asian Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Asian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.