William L. Fitch

2.8k citations
71 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 28

William L. Fitch

68 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

William L. Fitch
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Spectroscopy 464
  • Pharmacology 185
  • Organic Chemistry 338
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 196
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 61
Replace Masahiro Nakano with:
Masahiro Nakano Japan
Peng Zou United States
Lambert H.M. Janssen Netherlands
Gérard Vergoten France
Tetsurou Handa Japan
L. Koester Brazil
A. M. Mulichak United States
Wade J. Adams United States
Pramod C. Nair Australia
Noriaki Ikeda Japan
William L. Fitch relative to Masahiro Nakano Japan Masahiro Nakano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Masahiro Nakano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Fitch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Fitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Fitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Fitch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Fitch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Fitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Fitch. The network helps show where William L. Fitch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Fitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William L. Fitch Line = papers co-authored together William L. Fitch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20237
2 202122
3 20195
4
Enhancing the Value of Expert Assistance in Pro Se Competence Determinations.
20160
5 201576
6 201370
7 201249
8 201241
9 201031
10 20105
11 200971
12
AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
20076
13 20078
14 20020
15 20019
16 20012
17 200011
18 199736
19 197394
20
4-ビニルピリジニウム塩の重合 I 対イオン開始機構
19712

About William L. Fitch

William L. Fitch is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (23 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (10 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (5 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (464 citations), Pharmacology (185 citations) and Organic Chemistry (338 citations). William L. Fitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Sauter, Bo Wen, Ronald M. Krauss, Melissa A. Austin, John D. Brunzell, Christopher P. Holmes, Dennis H. Smith, J. C. Salamone, Paul A. Keifer and James Ν. Shoolery. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Environmental Science & Technology and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026