Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
High concordance of drug-induced human hepatotoxicity with in vitro cytotoxicity measured in a novel cell-based model using high content screening
2006472 citationsWilliam Irwin, Paolo Bernardi et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of William Irwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Irwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Irwin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Irwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Irwin. The network helps show where William Irwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Irwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Irwin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Irwin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Irwin. William Irwin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dunn, George A., et al.. (2012). The Hunger Games and Philosophy: A Critique of Pure Treason.17 indexed citations
3.
Irwin, William, et al.. (2011). The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and Philosophy: Everything is Fire.1 indexed citations
4.
Irwin, William, et al.. (2010). The Ultimate Harry Potter and Philosophy: Hogwarts for Muggles. Wiley eBooks.3 indexed citations
5.
Irwin, William & Mark D. White. (2010). Iron Man and Philosophy: Facing the Stark Reality. John Wiley eBooks.1 indexed citations
6.
Irwin, William & David Kyle Johnson. (2010). Introducing philosophy through pop culture : from Socrates to South Park, Hume to House. Wiley-Blackwell eBooks.2 indexed citations
7.
Irwin, William, et al.. (2009). Final fantasy and philosophy : the ultimate walkthrough. John Wiley eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
Irwin, William, Dubravko Jelić, & Roberto Antolović. (2008). Biomarkers for Drug Discovery: Important Aspects of in vitro Assay Design for HTS and HCS Bioassays. Croatica Chemica Acta. 81(1). 23–30.2 indexed citations
9.
Hicks, David, et al.. (2007). Beginning Teachers Thinking Historically? Negotiating the Context of Virginia's High-Stakes Tests. The International journal of social education. 22(1). 85–114.7 indexed citations
Irwin, William, et al.. (1983). The World Charter for Nature : a background paper. E. Schmidt eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Irwin, William, et al.. (1967). Verbesserung der Wasserqualitat bon Talsperrendurch kunstliche Umschichtung. 34. 158–174.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.