American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly

2.7k citations
742 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Historical Philosophy and Science

Papers in

    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 200
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 125
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 70
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 70
    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology 53
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 50
    • Historical Philosophy and Science 48

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly

377 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Philosophy 1.3k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 268
  • Religious studies 146
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 280
  • Sociology and Political Science 735
Replace The Modern Schoolman with:
The Modern Schoolman Australia
Philosophy and literature United States
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review United States
Revue Philosophique de Louvain France
Ancient Philosophy United States
Tijdschrift voor Philosophie United States
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie United States
Modern Theology United States
Philosophia Christi United States
˜The œreview of metaphysics United States
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly relative to The Modern Schoolman Australia The Modern Schoolman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
The Modern Schoolman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly more than expected).

Fields of papers published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.

About American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly

The 742 papers published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Papers published in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (453 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (79 papers), Classics (33 papers), Religious studies (32 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (69 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Philosophy and Theology (200 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (125 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (70 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (70 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (58 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (53 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (50 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly are Dennis L. Sepper, Kirk Besmer, Robert E. Wood, Alfred J. Freddoso, Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Bambach, John Greco, Brian J. Shanley, David B. Hershenov and Thomas Williams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact