Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient
1956150 citationsCreighton Gilbert, H. FrankfortJournal of Aesthetics and Art Criticismprofile →
Citations per year, relative to H. Frankfort H. Frankfort (= 1×)
peers
George M. A. Hanfmann
Countries citing papers authored by H. Frankfort
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Frankfort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Frankfort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Frankfort more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Frankfort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Frankfort. The network helps show where H. Frankfort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Frankfort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Frankfort.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Frankfort based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. Frankfort. H. Frankfort is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Nigro, Lorenzo, Paolo Matthiae, & H. Frankfort. (1997). Legittimazione e consenso: iconologia, religione e politica nelle stele di Sargon di Akkad. 351–392.
2.
Frankfort, H., et al.. (1982). Arte y arquitectura del Oriente Antiguo. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
Frankfort, H., et al.. (1976). Reyes y dioses: estudio de la religión del Oriente Próximo en la Antigüedad en tanto que integración de la sociedad y la naturaleza. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).3 indexed citations
5.
Frankfort, H., et al.. (1971). Art of Ancient Egypt. The Art Bulletin. 53(1). 109–109.5 indexed citations
6.
Frankfort, H.. (1965). Cylinder seals : a documentary essay on the art and religion of the Ancient Near East. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
7.
Frankfort, H., et al.. (1963). Before Philosophy, the Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man an Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East by H. And H.A. Frankfort [and Others].
8.
Frankfort, H.. (1958). The Dying God. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 21(3-4). 141–151.9 indexed citations
9.
Frankfort, H.. (1958). Heresy in a Theocratic State. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 21(3-4). 152–165.1 indexed citations
Frankfort, H., et al.. (1957). The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man an Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East, by H. And H.A. Frankfort [and Others].1 indexed citations
12.
Gilbert, Creighton & H. Frankfort. (1956). The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 14(3). 388–388.150 indexed citations breakdown →
Frankfort, H.. (1951). The problem of similarity in ancient near eastern religions. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.