William Harwin

4.8k total citations
141 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

William Harwin is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, William Harwin has authored 141 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 38 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 35 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in William Harwin's work include Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (32 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (30 papers) and Robot Manipulation and Learning (25 papers). William Harwin is often cited by papers focused on Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (32 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (30 papers) and Robot Manipulation and Learning (25 papers). William Harwin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. William Harwin's co-authors include Rui Loureiro, Farshid Amirabdollahian, R. Simon Sherratt, Tariq Rahman, Michael Topping, Bart Driessen, Michelle J. Johnson, Balazs Janko, Kiyoshi Nagai and Mohammad Ghamari and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the IEEE.

In The Last Decade

William Harwin

134 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William Harwin 1.5k 1.2k 677 488 470 141 3.1k
Marko Munih 1.8k 1.2× 908 0.7× 649 1.0× 149 0.3× 285 0.6× 183 3.3k
Rong Song 2.0k 1.4× 1.2k 1.0× 824 1.2× 273 0.6× 320 0.7× 188 3.4k
Jacob Rosén 4.4k 2.9× 1.6k 1.3× 779 1.2× 244 0.5× 911 1.9× 129 6.2k
Yoky Matsuoka 1.8k 1.2× 431 0.4× 971 1.4× 160 0.3× 1.1k 2.3× 95 3.4k
Loredana Zollo 3.0k 2.0× 987 0.8× 1.7k 2.5× 214 0.4× 1.1k 2.3× 213 4.6k
Marcia K. O’Malley 3.0k 2.0× 2.0k 1.6× 2.0k 2.9× 332 0.7× 761 1.6× 236 5.4k
Eugenio Guglielmelli 3.6k 2.4× 977 0.8× 2.2k 3.2× 265 0.5× 1.2k 2.5× 259 5.8k
Kazuo Kiguchi 3.3k 2.2× 1.7k 1.4× 929 1.4× 146 0.3× 886 1.9× 254 4.3k
H. F. Machiel Van der Loos 1.6k 1.1× 2.7k 2.2× 1.1k 1.6× 1.0k 2.1× 505 1.1× 141 4.8k
Olivier Lambercy 2.5k 1.7× 2.2k 1.8× 1.0k 1.5× 702 1.4× 338 0.7× 165 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by William Harwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Harwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Harwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Harwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Harwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Harwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Harwin. The network helps show where William Harwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Harwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Harwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Harwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Harwin. William Harwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Janko, Balazs, et al.. (2023). Classification of static postures with wearable sensors mounted on loose clothing. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 131–131. 10 indexed citations
2.
Wairagkar, Maitreyee, Rachel King, Balazs Janko, et al.. (2022). A novel approach for modelling and classifying sit-to-stand kinematics using inertial sensors. PLoS ONE. 17(10). e0264126–e0264126. 7 indexed citations
3.
Harwin, William, et al.. (2021). Mutual Skill Learning and Adaptability to Others via Haptic Interaction. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 15. 760132–760132. 2 indexed citations
4.
Sherratt, R. Simon, Balazs Janko, Terence Hui, et al.. (2019). Task Scheduling to Constrain Peak Current Consumption in Wearable Healthcare Sensors. Electronics. 8(7). 789–789. 3 indexed citations
5.
Stack, Emma, Veena R. Agarwal, Rachel King, et al.. (2018). Identifying balance impairments in people with Parkinson’s disease using video and wearable sensors. Gait & Posture. 62. 321–326. 39 indexed citations
6.
Webb, Mary, William Harwin, Faustina Hwang, et al.. (2017). The potential for haptic-enabled interaction to support collaborative learning in school biology. CentAUR (University of Reading). 927–935. 4 indexed citations
7.
Andrews, Brian, et al.. (2016). A Design Method for FES Bone Health Therapy in SCI. European Journal of Translational Myology. 26(4). 6419–6419. 7 indexed citations
8.
Harwin, William, et al.. (2016). Biosimilars: Opportunities to Promote Optimization Through Payer and Provider Collaboration. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy. 22(9-a Suppl). S3–S9. 13 indexed citations
9.
Oguntosin, Victoria, William Harwin, Sadao Kawamura, Slawomir J. Nasuto, & Yoshikatsu Hayashi. (2015). Development of a wearable assistive soft robotic device for elbow rehabilitation. 747–752. 50 indexed citations
10.
Mitchell, Richard, et al.. (2012). Cybernetics, Circuits and Computing.
11.
Loureiro, Rui, William Harwin, Kiyoshi Nagai, & Michelle J. Johnson. (2011). Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 49(10). 1103–1118. 165 indexed citations
12.
Harwin, William, Alessio Murgia, & Emma Stokes. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of robot facilitated neurorehabilitation for relearning motor skills following a stroke. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 49(10). 1093–1102. 18 indexed citations
13.
Reynolds, P. A., Tim Newton, William Harwin, et al.. (2008). Methods to teach and evaluate dental clinical skills using Haptics. Journal of Dental Research. 2 indexed citations
14.
Harwin, William, et al.. (2004). A Haptic Interface for Linked Immersive and Desktop Displays: Maintaining Sufficient Frame Rate for Haptic Rendering.. 478–483. 1 indexed citations
15.
Amirabdollahian, Farshid, Rui Loureiro, & William Harwin. (2002). A case study on the effects of a haptic interface on human arm movements with implications for rehabilitation robotics. CentAUR (University of Reading). 1 indexed citations
16.
Rahman, Tariq, et al.. (1998). Performance statistics of a head-operated force-reflecting rehabilitation robot system. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering. 6(4). 406–414. 10 indexed citations
17.
Rahman, Tariq, et al.. (1996). Calibration of Closed Loop Controllers for Setting Impedances in Force-Reflecting Systems. Dynamic Systems and Control. 593–600. 2 indexed citations
18.
Rahman, Tariq & William Harwin. (1993). Bilateral control in teleoperation of a rehabilitation robot.. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1833. 20–27. 1 indexed citations
19.
Harwin, William, et al.. (1990). Analysis of intentional head gestures to assist computer access by physically disabled people. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 12(3). 193–198. 26 indexed citations
20.
Gosine, Raymond G., et al.. (1989). An intelligent end-effector for a rehabilitation robot. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 13(1-2). 37–43. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026