Emma Stokes

2.2k total citations
73 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Emma Stokes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Stokes has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in General Health Professions, 26 papers in Rehabilitation and 16 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Emma Stokes's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (18 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (13 papers). Emma Stokes is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (18 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (13 papers). Emma Stokes collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Canada. Emma Stokes's co-authors include Rose Galvin, Tara Cusack, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Tracy Bury, Susan Coote, William Harwin, Desmond O’Neill, Sara Hayes, Claire Donnellan and Mansour Abdullah Alshehri and has published in prestigious journals such as Stroke, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

In The Last Decade

Emma Stokes

70 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Stokes Ireland 24 570 380 261 211 190 73 1.4k
Maria Huijbregts Canada 21 766 1.3× 315 0.8× 552 2.1× 198 0.9× 117 0.6× 35 1.6k
Sara Demain United Kingdom 23 624 1.1× 297 0.8× 359 1.4× 115 0.5× 124 0.7× 53 1.6k
Beverley French United Kingdom 15 510 0.9× 410 1.1× 206 0.8× 93 0.4× 165 0.9× 39 1.2k
Brian J. Dudgeon United States 25 252 0.4× 253 0.7× 485 1.9× 162 0.8× 178 0.9× 49 1.8k
Sander L. Hitzig Canada 29 511 0.9× 350 0.9× 579 2.2× 161 0.8× 106 0.6× 172 2.4k
Rhonda M. Williams United States 29 479 0.8× 257 0.7× 297 1.1× 244 1.2× 130 0.7× 117 2.4k
Sara McEwen Canada 23 999 1.8× 324 0.9× 715 2.7× 160 0.8× 116 0.6× 62 2.0k
Rosana Ferreira Sampaio Brazil 28 252 0.4× 493 1.3× 570 2.2× 221 1.0× 79 0.4× 130 2.2k
Amol Karmarkar United States 26 330 0.6× 374 1.0× 402 1.5× 63 0.3× 82 0.4× 100 1.8k
Naoimh E. McMahon United Kingdom 15 559 1.0× 188 0.5× 224 0.9× 131 0.6× 169 0.9× 26 957

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stokes. The network helps show where Emma Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Stokes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Stokes. Emma Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stokes, Emma, Marguerite Wieler, François Desmeules, et al.. (2023). Developing an international competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy: a scoping review with narrative synthesis. Physiotherapy. 122. 3–16. 7 indexed citations
2.
Desmeules, François, Laura Finucane, Jeremy Lewis, et al.. (2021). Advanced practice in physiotherapy: a global survey. Physiotherapy. 113. 168–176. 32 indexed citations
3.
Lewis, Jeremy, Emma Stokes, Boris Gojanovic, et al.. (2021). Reframing how we care for people with persistent non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain. Suggestions for the rehabilitation community. Physiotherapy. 112. 143–149. 27 indexed citations
4.
Gutenbrünner, Christoph, Emma Stokes, Karsten Dreinhöfer, et al.. (2020). Why Rehabilitation must have priority during and after the COVID-19-pandemic: A position statement of the Global Rehabilitation Alliance. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 52(7). 0–0. 44 indexed citations
5.
Stokes, Emma, et al.. (2020). Core competencies for physiotherapists working with refugees: a scoping review. Physiotherapy. 108. 10–21. 5 indexed citations
6.
Alshehri, Mansour Abdullah, et al.. (2017). Physiotherapists’ behaviour, attitudes, awareness, knowledge and barriers in relation to evidence-based practice implementation in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 15(3). 127–141. 59 indexed citations
7.
Mockler, David, et al.. (2015). Ability of physiotherapists to undertake evidence-based practice steps: a scoping review. Physiotherapy. 102(1). 10–19. 54 indexed citations
8.
Galvin, Rose, Emma Stokes, & Tara Cusack. (2014). Family-Mediated Exercises (FAME): An Exploration of Participant’s Involvement in a Novel Form of Exercise Delivery After Stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 21(1). 63–74. 26 indexed citations
9.
Galvin, Rose, et al.. (2014). Do women with breast cancer report treatment after-effects to healthcare professionals, and who provides the intervention?. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 38(1). 20–26. 2 indexed citations
10.
Galvin, Rose, et al.. (2014). Addition of motivational interventions to exercise and traditional Physiotherapy: a review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 101(1). 1–12. 108 indexed citations
11.
Hayes, Sara, Claire Donnellan, & Emma Stokes. (2012). Associations between executive function and physical function poststroke: a pilot study. Physiotherapy. 99(2). 165–171. 24 indexed citations
12.
Harwin, William, Alessio Murgia, & Emma Stokes. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of robot facilitated neurorehabilitation for relearning motor skills following a stroke. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 49(10). 1093–1102. 18 indexed citations
13.
Stokes, Emma, et al.. (2011). Current Knowledge of Pain After Breast Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Pain Management Nursing. 14(2). 110–123. 24 indexed citations
14.
Stokes, Emma, C M Pine, & Rebecca Harris. (2009). The promotion of oral health within the Healthy School context in England: a qualitative research study. BMC Oral Health. 9(1). 3–3. 16 indexed citations
15.
Galvin, Rose, Tara Cusack, & Emma Stokes. (2009). Physiotherapy after stroke in Ireland: a qualitative insight into the patients' and physiotherapists' experience. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 32(3). 238–244. 25 indexed citations
17.
Toth, Alison P., et al.. (2005). Assessment of recovery at stroke patients by whole-body isometric force-torque measurements of functional tasks I: mechanical design of the device. CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies). 2 indexed citations
18.
Stokes, Emma. (2005). Determining Liverpool adolescents' beliefs and attitudes in relation to oral health. Health Education Research. 21(2). 192–205. 57 indexed citations
19.
Stokes, Emma, et al.. (1997). Characteristics of Graduate Adult Health Nursing Programs. Journal of Nursing Education. 36(2). 54–59. 4 indexed citations
20.
Hogan, David B., et al.. (1996). Evaluation of a Self‐Medication Program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 44(2). 161–165. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026