William F. Bacon
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Howard E. EgethLeslie M. KantorMichael McCloskeyGislin DagnelieSteven YantisRonald J. TusaDana BoatmanBrenda Rapp
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper)
- Journals
- Psychological ScienceJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceHuman Development
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William F. Bacon
8 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 286
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 181
- Social Psychology 119
- Sensory Systems 76
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Bacon
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Bacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Bacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Bacon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Bacon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Bacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Bacon. The network helps show where William F. Bacon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Bacon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Bacon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Bacon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Bacon. William F. Bacon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abstinence-only programs implemented under welfare reform are incompatible with research on effective sexuality education. | 7 |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | What Everyone Knows about Attention | 0 |
| 5 | Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capturebreakdown → | 912 |
| 6 | 87 | |
| 7 | 70 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 20 |
About William F. Bacon
William F. Bacon is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability and Gender Studies, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), General Decision Sciences (66 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (286 citations). William F. Bacon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Howard E. Egeth, Leslie M. Kantor, Michael McCloskey, Gislin Dagnelie, Steven Yantis, Ronald J. Tusa, Dana Boatman, Brenda Rapp, Gary S. Rubin and William Badecker. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Human Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.