William E. Loges

1.4k citations
16 papers · 974 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Loges

16 papers receiving 810 citations

Peers

William E. Loges
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Communication 238
  • Information Systems and Management 102
  • Sociology and Political Science 545
  • Public Administration 38
  • Demography 101
Replace Richard Adler with:
Richard Adler United States
Patricia M. Sias United States
Clifford G. Christians United States
Christine Ogan United States
Hans‐Georg Wolff Germany
Pamela Shockley‐Zalabak United States
Samuel J. Best United States
Linda A. Krefting United States
Anne Hendershott United States
Anthony McCosker Australia
William E. Loges relative to Richard Adler United States Richard Adler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Richard Adler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Loges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Loges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Loges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Loges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Loges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Loges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Loges. The network helps show where William E. Loges may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William E. Loges, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Loges Line = papers co-authored together William E. Loges links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2001285
2 2006166
3 1994140
4 199382
5 200380
6 200664
7 199461
8 199428
9 199916
10 200814
11 200711
12 200010
13
The media and morality
19997
14 20057
15 20032
16 20161

About William E. Loges

William E. Loges is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Social Psychology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and General Social Sciences, having authored 16 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (2 papers), Social Capital and Networks (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (238 citations), Information Systems and Management (102 citations), Sociology and Political Science (545 citations), Public Administration (38 citations) and Demography (101 citations). William E. Loges has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joo-Young Jung, Sandra J. Ball‐Rokeach, J. Kevin Barge, Daniel M. Mayton, Christopher Weare, Juliet Musso, Jon Bruschke and Robert Baird. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Research, Journal of Social Issues, The American Review of Public Administration, Communication Monographs and Journal of Applied Communication Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact