Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What Do We Mean By “Civic Engagement”?
2005546 citationsRichard Adler et al.Journal of Transformative Educationprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Richard Adler Richard Adler (= 1×)
peers
Alvin Hwang
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Adler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Adler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Adler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Adler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Adler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Adler. The network helps show where Richard Adler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Adler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Adler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Adler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Adler. Richard Adler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Adler, Richard, et al.. (2005). What Do We Mean By “Civic Engagement”?. Journal of Transformative Education. 3(3). 236–253.546 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Adler, Richard & Patricia Senn Breivik. (1999). Information Literacy: Advancing Opportunities for Learning in the Digital Age. A Report of The Aspen Institute Forum on Communications and Society..6 indexed citations
5.
Adler, Richard. (1998). Jobs, Technology, and Employability: Redefining the Social Contract..3 indexed citations
6.
Adler, Richard, et al.. (1997). The future of advertising : new approaches to the attention economy : a report of the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program.3 indexed citations
7.
Adler, Richard. (1981). Understanding television : essays on television as a social and cultural force. Praeger eBooks.26 indexed citations
8.
Fletcher, James E. & Richard Adler. (1981). Broadcasting. Communication Booknotes. 12(7). 75–75.
9.
DiMaggio, Paul, Richard Adler, & Douglass Cater. (1977). Television as a Cultural Force.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 6(5). 545–545.32 indexed citations
10.
Adler, Richard. (1977). Research on the Effects of Television Advertising on Children; A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research..25 indexed citations
11.
Cater, Douglass & Richard Adler. (1975). Television As a Social Force: New Approaches to TV Criticism. Medical Entomology and Zoology.42 indexed citations
12.
Adler, Richard & Walter S. Baer. (1974). The Electronic Box Office: Humanities and Arts On the Cable..1 indexed citations
13.
Adler, Richard & Walter S. Baer. (1973). Aspen Notebook: Cable and Continuing Education.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.