William David
Impact in
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research 6
- Genetics 5
- Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research 4
- Co-authors
- Merit Cudkowicz (4 shared papers)David Schoenfeld (3 shared papers)Eric A. Macklin (4 shared papers)Stanley H. Appel (2 shared papers)Ericka Simpson (2 shared papers)C. Frank Bennett (2 shared papers)Lyle W. Ostrow (1 shared paper)Alan Pestronk (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurology (8 papers)Muscle & Nerve (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (1 paper)Neuropharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandSweden
In The Last Decade
William David
17 papers receiving 938 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Genetics 367
- Neurology 507
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 197
- Neurology 81
- Molecular Biology 436
Countries citing papers authored by William David
This map shows the geographic impact of William David's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William David with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William David more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William David
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William David. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William David. The network helps show where William David may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William David, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | An antisense oligonucleotide against SOD1 delivered intrathecally for patients with SOD1 familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase 1, randomised, first-in-man study Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 492 |
| 2 | 2018 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 96 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 18 | Mechanical stimulation of intervertebral disc cells by cyclic hydrostatic pressure | 2002 | 0 |
About William David
William David is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (6 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (4 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (1 paper) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (367 citations), Neurology (507 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (197 citations), Neurology (81 citations) and Molecular Biology (436 citations). William David has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Merit Cudkowicz, David Schoenfeld, Eric A. Macklin, Stanley H. Appel, Ericka Simpson, C. Frank Bennett, Lyle W. Ostrow, Alan Pestronk, Kathie M. Bishop and Timothy M. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Muscle & Nerve, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy and Neuropharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.