Wendy De Moor
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Education top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tom VergutsMarc BrysbaertWim GeversFilip Van OpstalMandy GhyselinckWim NotebaertRobert J. Hartsuiker
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionPsychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPsychological Research
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Wendy De Moor
10 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 275
- Cognitive Neuroscience 239
- Statistics and Probability 215
- Education 132
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Wendy De Moor
This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy De Moor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy De Moor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy De Moor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wendy De Moor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy De Moor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy De Moor. The network helps show where Wendy De Moor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wendy De Moor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wendy De Moor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wendy De Moor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wendy De Moor. Wendy De Moor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 135 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 81 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | Visuele woordherkenning bij tweetalige personen | 1 |
About Wendy De Moor
Wendy De Moor is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (215 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (275 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (239 citations). Wendy De Moor has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tom Verguts, Marc Brysbaert, Wim Gevers, Filip Van Opstal, Mandy Ghyselinck, Wim Notebaert and Robert J. Hartsuiker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and Psychological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.