W. Austin Spivey

409 total citations
23 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

W. Austin Spivey is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Austin Spivey has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Strategy and Management, 6 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in W. Austin Spivey's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (4 papers) and Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (3 papers). W. Austin Spivey is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (4 papers) and Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (3 papers). W. Austin Spivey collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. W. Austin Spivey's co-authors include J. Michael Munson, William B. Locander, David F. Caldwell, Kevin P. Grant, Glenn Dietrich and Bernd Wurth and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Business Research and Personnel Psychology.

In The Last Decade

W. Austin Spivey

22 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
W. Austin Spivey United States	11	100	80	75	73	67	23	297
Nessim Hanna United States	10	97 1.0×	51 0.6×	65 0.9×	70 1.0×	43 0.6×	23	264
E. Peelen Netherlands	8	105 1.1×	112 1.4×	78 1.0×	143 2.0×	41 0.6×	21	370
Vince Howe United States	8	124 1.2×	71 0.9×	104 1.4×	248 3.4×	52 0.8×	14	427
Jongseok Cha South Korea	7	57 0.6×	156 1.9×	39 0.5×	141 1.9×	36 0.5×	16	344
Gene Deszca Canada	8	30 0.3×	67 0.8×	35 0.5×	75 1.0×	36 0.5×	15	225
Paul Christie United States	2	56 0.6×	84 1.1×	71 0.9×	93 1.3×	18 0.3×	5	327
Margaret Bruce United Kingdom	8	143 1.4×	44 0.6×	69 0.9×	29 0.4×	19 0.3×	14	243
Edwin A. Gerloff United States	6	24 0.2×	104 1.3×	73 1.0×	78 1.1×	27 0.4×	13	349
Anate Benoit Nicaise Abbey United States	3	31 0.3×	127 1.6×	20 0.3×	123 1.7×	32 0.5×	11	327
Martin T. Topol United States	10	91 0.9×	70 0.9×	36 0.5×	156 2.1×	34 0.5×	20	325

Countries citing papers authored by W. Austin Spivey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Austin Spivey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Austin Spivey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Austin Spivey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Austin Spivey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Austin Spivey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Austin Spivey. The network helps show where W. Austin Spivey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Austin Spivey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Austin Spivey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Austin Spivey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Austin Spivey. W. Austin Spivey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Spivey, W. Austin, J. Michael Munson, & Bernd Wurth. (2014). Implications of the America Invents Act for R&D Managers: Connecting the Patent Life Cycle with the Technology Development Process. Research-Technology Management. 57(5). 43–52. 4 indexed citations

Grant, Kevin P., et al.. (2010). Technology transfer contracts between R&D labs and commercial partners: choose your words wisely. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 37(4). 577–587. 11 indexed citations

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (2009). Growth among technology service firms: insights from the balanced scorecard. International Journal of Services Technology and Management. 13(1/2). 63–63.

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (2009). Improve Tech Transfer with This Alliance Scorecard. Research-Technology Management. 52(1). 10–18. 3 indexed citations

Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey. (2006). Take a Portfolio View of CRADAs. Research-Technology Management. 49(4). 39–45. 6 indexed citations

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (2002). A generic value tree for high-technology enterprises. International Journal of Technology Management. 24(2/3). 219–219. 4 indexed citations

Spivey, W. Austin. (1997). Improving the new product development process: A fractal paradigm for high-technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 14(3). 203–218. 29 indexed citations

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (1997). Improving the New Product Development Process: A Fractal Paradigm for High‐Technology Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 14(3). 203–218. 26 indexed citations

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (1997). Coordinating the technology transfer and transition of information technology: a phenomenological perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 44(4). 359–366. 11 indexed citations

10.

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (1994). Understanding the environs that impact technology transfer and transition. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 19(2). 63–73. 8 indexed citations

11.

Spivey, W. Austin, et al.. (1990). Interest in technology transfer across academic disciplines: Publication trends, 1981 Thru 1989. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 15(3). 13–20. 5 indexed citations

12.

Caldwell, David F. & W. Austin Spivey. (1983). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECRUITING SOURCE AND EMPLOYEE SUCCESS: AN ANALYSIS BY RACE. Personnel Psychology. 36(1). 67–72. 36 indexed citations

13.

Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey. (1983). Relation between Social Class and Three Aspects of Self-Concept: Actual, Ideal, and Egocentric Self. The Journal of Social Psychology. 119(1). 85–94. 5 indexed citations

14.

Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey. (1982). The Factorial Validity of an Inventory Assessing Horney's Interpersonal Response Traits of Compliance, Aggression, and Detachment. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 42(3). 889–898. 1 indexed citations

15.

Spivey, W. Austin & David F. Caldwell. (1982). Improving MBA Teaching Evaluation: Insights from Critical Incident Methodology. Journal of Marketing Education. 4(1). 25–30. 11 indexed citations

16.

Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey. (1981). Product and Brand-User Stereotypes among Social Classes. Journal of Advertising Research. 21(4). 37–46. 42 indexed citations

17.

Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey. (1980). Assessing Self Concept. ACR North American Advances. 21 indexed citations

18.

Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey. (1980). Salesforce selection that meets federal regulation and management needs. Industrial Marketing Management. 9(1). 11–21. 2 indexed citations

19.

Locander, William B. & W. Austin Spivey. (1978). A Functional Approach to Attitude Measurement. Journal of Marketing Research. 15(4). 576–576. 14 indexed citations

20.

Locander, William B. & W. Austin Spivey. (1978). A Functional Approach to Attitude Measurement. Journal of Marketing Research. 15(4). 576–587. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact