Journal of Philosophical Logic

1.4k papers and 19.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Journal of Philosophical Logic in the last decades have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Philosophical Logic usually cover Artificial Intelligence (908 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (583 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (367 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (798 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (438 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (360 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Philosophical Logic are David Lewis, Kit Fine, Graham Priest, George Lakoff, Adam J. Grove, Frank Veltman, David Makinson, Lloyd Humberstone, Nuel Belnap and Robert Stalnaker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Philosophical Logic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Philosophical Logic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Philosophical Logic.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Philosophical Logic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Philosophical Logic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Philosophical Logic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Philosophical Logic more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025