Vladimir N. Noskov
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Genetics top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vladimir LarionovNatalay KouprinaDaniel G. GibsonJohn I. GlassHamilton O. SmithJ. Craig VenterChuck MerrymanMikkel A. Algire
- Topics
- Fungal and yeast genetics research (26 papers)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (17 papers)DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanRussia
In The Last Decade
Vladimir N. Noskov
53 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Molecular Biology 2.6k
- Genetics 791
- Plant Science 622
- Ecology 329
- Cell Biology 198
Countries citing papers authored by Vladimir N. Noskov
This map shows the geographic impact of Vladimir N. Noskov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vladimir N. Noskov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vladimir N. Noskov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vladimir N. Noskov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vladimir N. Noskov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vladimir N. Noskov. The network helps show where Vladimir N. Noskov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vladimir N. Noskov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vladimir N. Noskov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vladimir N. Noskov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vladimir N. Noskov. Vladimir N. Noskov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 105 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 208 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | Complete Chemical Synthesis, Assembly, and Cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium Genomebreakdown → | 840 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 153 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 72 | |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | Development of intragenic mapping system for molecular-genetic analysis of mutations in LYS2 gene of Saccharomyces yeast | 3 |
About Vladimir N. Noskov
Vladimir N. Noskov is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (26 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (17 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (2.6k citations), Genetics (791 citations) and Microbiology (125 citations). Vladimir N. Noskov has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Vladimir Larionov, Natalay Kouprina, Daniel G. Gibson, John I. Glass, Hamilton O. Smith, J. Craig Venter, Chuck Merryman, Mikkel A. Algire, Gwynedd A. Benders and David W. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.