Victoria Pile
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Y. F. LauEmily A. HolmesPatrick SmithSimone P. HallerPaul MontgomeryMichelle Degli EspostiSean GrantGeorgina Krebs
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (17 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers)Identity, Memory, and Therapy (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyClinical PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenGermany
In The Last Decade
Victoria Pile
25 papers receiving 389 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Clinical Psychology 213
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 207
- Psychiatry and Mental health 97
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 81
Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Pile
This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Pile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Pile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Pile more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Pile
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Pile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Pile. The network helps show where Victoria Pile may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Pile
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Pile. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Pile based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Pile. Victoria Pile is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About Victoria Pile
Victoria Pile is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (17 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (207 citations), Clinical Psychology (213 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (91 citations). Victoria Pile has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Y. F. Lau, Emily A. Holmes, Patrick Smith, Simone P. Haller, Paul Montgomery, Michelle Degli Esposti, Sean Grant, Georgina Krebs, Til Wykes and Andrew Watson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Clinical Psychology Review and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.