Faith Orchard
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Shirley ReynoldsLaura PassMichael GradisarTim ClarkeBrioney GeeAlice M. GregoryCathy CreswellJerica Radež
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (25 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers)Sleep and related disorders (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Psychology ReviewJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Faith Orchard
31 papers receiving 892 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Clinical Psychology 497
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 483
- Cognitive Neuroscience 213
- Education 153
- Social Psychology 133
Countries citing papers authored by Faith Orchard
This map shows the geographic impact of Faith Orchard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faith Orchard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faith Orchard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Faith Orchard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faith Orchard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faith Orchard. The network helps show where Faith Orchard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Faith Orchard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Faith Orchard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Faith Orchard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Faith Orchard. Faith Orchard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 139 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Faith Orchard
Faith Orchard is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (25 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (483 citations), Clinical Psychology (497 citations) and Applied Psychology (73 citations). Faith Orchard has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shirley Reynolds, Laura Pass, Michael Gradisar, Tim Clarke, Brioney Gee, Alice M. Gregory, Cathy Creswell, Jerica Radež, Tessa Reardon and Polly Waite. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Psychology Review and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.