James J. Lickel

812 total citations
17 papers, 568 citations indexed

About

James J. Lickel is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, James J. Lickel has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 568 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in James J. Lickel's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers). James J. Lickel is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers). James J. Lickel collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. James J. Lickel's co-authors include Brett J. Deacon, Joshua Kemp, Jennifer T. Sy, Jonathan S. Abramowitz, E Andrea Nelson, Laura J. Dixon, Nicholas R. Farrell, Kate Wolitzky‐Taylor, Elizabeth A. Nelson and Brittain Mahaffey and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Behavior Therapy and Journal of Anxiety Disorders.

In The Last Decade

James J. Lickel

16 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James J. Lickel United States 12 346 341 123 121 108 17 568
Lucia Tecuta Italy 10 401 1.2× 212 0.6× 94 0.8× 161 1.3× 145 1.3× 21 641
Barbara Cludius Germany 15 610 1.8× 471 1.4× 121 1.0× 158 1.3× 138 1.3× 39 825
Jon Wheatley United Kingdom 11 493 1.4× 470 1.4× 120 1.0× 154 1.3× 157 1.5× 29 853
Jennifer T. Sy United States 12 476 1.4× 387 1.1× 118 1.0× 152 1.3× 164 1.5× 16 797
Kathryn Ponniah United States 8 340 1.0× 197 0.6× 89 0.7× 77 0.6× 66 0.6× 9 541
Lyuba Bobova United States 11 359 1.0× 286 0.8× 82 0.7× 74 0.6× 103 1.0× 11 671
D. Lam United Kingdom 11 512 1.5× 339 1.0× 132 1.1× 250 2.1× 72 0.7× 15 780
Emily L. Gentes United States 11 646 1.9× 571 1.7× 98 0.8× 129 1.1× 159 1.5× 15 974
Céline Baeyens France 14 360 1.0× 345 1.0× 99 0.8× 56 0.5× 128 1.2× 31 615
Sandy Callen Tierney United States 4 280 0.8× 159 0.5× 96 0.8× 81 0.7× 146 1.4× 7 433

Countries citing papers authored by James J. Lickel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Lickel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Lickel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Lickel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Lickel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Lickel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Lickel. The network helps show where James J. Lickel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. Lickel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. Lickel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. Lickel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James J. Lickel. James J. Lickel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
2.
Bramoweth, Adam D., et al.. (2023). Reduction of Sleep Medications via a Combined Digital Insomnia and Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing Intervention: Protocol for a Feasibility Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 12. e47636–e47636. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kemp, Joshua, James J. Lickel, & Brett J. Deacon. (2014). Effects of a chemical imbalance causal explanation on individuals' perceptions of their depressive symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 56. 47–52. 86 indexed citations
4.
Kemp, Joshua, et al.. (2013). A Comparison of Cognitive and Behavioral Approaches for Reducing Cost Bias in Social Anxiety. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 27(3). 210–220. 3 indexed citations
5.
Deacon, Brett J., et al.. (2013). Therapist perceptions and delivery of interoceptive exposure for panic disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 27(2). 259–264. 71 indexed citations
6.
Lickel, James J., et al.. (2013). Breathing Retraining for Individuals Who Fear Respiratory Sensations: Examination of Safety Behavior and Coping Aid Hypotheses. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 27(2). 111–125. 4 indexed citations
7.
Farrell, Nicholas R., Brett J. Deacon, Laura J. Dixon, & James J. Lickel. (2013). Theory-based training strategies for modifying practitioner concerns about exposure therapy. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 27(8). 781–787. 59 indexed citations
8.
Deacon, Brett J., James J. Lickel, Jonathan S. Abramowitz, & Patrick B. McGrath. (2012). Development and Validation of the Shy Bladder Scale. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 41(3). 251–260. 10 indexed citations
9.
Deacon, Brett J., et al.. (2012). Do Cognitive Reappraisal and Diaphragmatic Breathing Augment Interoceptive Exposure for Anxiety Sensitivity?. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 26(3). 257–269. 27 indexed citations
10.
Deacon, Brett J., et al.. (2011). Cognitive Defusion Versus Cognitive Restructuring in the Treatment of Negative Self-Referential Thoughts: An Investigation of Process and Outcome. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 25(3). 218–232. 52 indexed citations
11.
Sy, Jennifer T., Laura J. Dixon, James J. Lickel, E Andrea Nelson, & Brett J. Deacon. (2011). Failure to replicate the deleterious effects of safety behaviors in exposure therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 49(5). 305–314. 45 indexed citations
12.
Nelson, E Andrea, James J. Lickel, Jennifer T. Sy, Laura J. Dixon, & Brett J. Deacon. (2010). Probability and Cost Biases in Social Phobia: Nature, Specificity, and Relationship to Treatment Outcome. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 24(3). 213–228. 23 indexed citations
13.
Deacon, Brett J. & James J. Lickel. (2009). On the brain disease model of mental disorders.. Behavior Therapy. 11 indexed citations
14.
Deacon, Brett J., Jennifer T. Sy, James J. Lickel, & E Andrea Nelson. (2009). Does the judicious use of safety behaviors improve the efficacy and acceptability of exposure therapy for claustrophobic fear?. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 41(1). 71–80. 55 indexed citations
15.
Nelson, E Andrea, Brett J. Deacon, James J. Lickel, & Jennifer T. Sy. (2009). Targeting the probability versus cost of feared outcomes in public speaking anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 48(4). 282–289. 18 indexed citations
16.
Lickel, James J., et al.. (2008). Interoceptive Exposure Exercises for Evoking Depersonalization and Derealization: A Pilot Study. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 22(4). 321–330. 28 indexed citations
17.
Deacon, Brett J., James J. Lickel, & Jonathan S. Abramowitz. (2007). Medical utilization across the anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 22(2). 344–350. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026