Denise Wilson
- Health top 2%
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights 15
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 10
- Research and Theory top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 4
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Global Health Workforce Issues 11
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child Abuse and Trauma 7
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 4
-
- Cultural Competency in Health Care 10
-
- Research in Social Sciences 3
- Co-authors
- Stephen NevilleDebra JacksonJenny ParrJane Koziol‐McLainJulia SlarkVanessa HeaslipJuanita SherwoodKaren Eden
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Denise Wilson
54 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Health 304
- Research and Theory 13
- General Health Professions 305
- Emergency Medical Services 77
- Clinical Psychology 170
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Wilson
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Wilson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Wilson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Wilson. The network helps show where Denise Wilson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Wilson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 16 | Cultural Invisibility: Maori People with Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Experiences of Neuropsychological Assessments | 2014 | 5 |
| 17 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 93 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 20 | Utility of Shared Versus Isolated Work Setting for Dynamic Team Decision-Making | 1987 | 0 |
About Denise Wilson
Denise Wilson is a scholar working on Health, Emergency Medical Services and Research and Theory, having authored 59 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (15 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (11 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (10 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Research in Social Sciences (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (304 citations), Research and Theory (13 citations) and General Health Professions (305 citations). Denise Wilson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Neville, Debra Jackson, Jenny Parr, Jane Koziol‐McLain, Julia Slark, Vanessa Heaslip, Juanita Sherwood, Karen Eden, Shyamala Nada‐Raja and Alain C. Vandal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.