Valentin Blomer

1.8k citations
72 papers · 731 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Valentin Blomer

66 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Valentin Blomer
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Algebra and Number Theory 663
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 258
  • Mathematical Physics 529
  • Geometry and Topology 267
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
Replace Scott Ahlgren with:
Scott Ahlgren United States
Roozbeh Hazrat Australia
Jörg Brüdern Germany
T. D. Browning United Kingdom
Wenguang Zhai China
Markus Rost Germany
Aleksandar Ivić Serbia
Nikita A. Karpenko Canada
S. M. Gonek United States
Brian Conrey United States
Valentin Blomer relative to Scott Ahlgren United States Scott Ahlgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Scott Ahlgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Valentin Blomer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Valentin Blomer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Valentin Blomer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Valentin Blomer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Valentin Blomer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Valentin Blomer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Valentin Blomer. The network helps show where Valentin Blomer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Valentin Blomer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Valentin Blomer Line = papers co-authored together Valentin Blomer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201358
2 200857
3 200744
4
200438
5 201233
6 201528
7 200726
8 200726
9 200825
10 201022
11 201517
12 200816
13 200816
14 200516
15 201814
16 200414
17 200413
18 201513
19 201312
20 200612

About Valentin Blomer

Valentin Blomer is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (59 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (43 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (18 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (16 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (12 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (9 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (7 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (663 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (258 citations), Mathematical Physics (529 citations), Geometry and Topology (267 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations). Valentin Blomer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gergely Harcos, Philippe Michel, Matthew P. Young, Jörg Brüdern, Zhengyu Mao, Andrew Granville, Xiaoqing Li, Stephen D. Miller, Zeév Rudnick and Jean Bourgain. Their work appears in journals such as Geometric and Functional Analysis, Duke Mathematical Journal, Annales Scientifiques de l École Normale Supérieure, International Mathematics Research Notices and Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact