Duke Mathematical Journal

5.3k papers and 130.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.3k papers published in Duke Mathematical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 130.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Duke Mathematical Journal usually cover Geometry and Topology (2.7k papers), Mathematical Physics (2.6k papers) and Applied Mathematics (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (1.2k papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (1.1k papers) and Geometric and Algebraic Topology (560 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Duke Mathematical Journal are Masaki Kashiwara, L. Carlitz, Robert S. Strichartz, George J. Minty, Hiraku Nakajima, Mikhail Khovanov, Goro Shimura, Carlos E. Kenig, Nigel Hitchin and Richard O’Neil.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Duke Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Duke Mathematical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Duke Mathematical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Duke Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Duke Mathematical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Duke Mathematical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duke Mathematical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025