Geometric and Functional Analysis

1.4k papers and 35.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Geometric and Functional Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 35.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Geometric and Functional Analysis usually cover Geometry and Topology (850 papers), Mathematical Physics (795 papers) and Applied Mathematics (642 papers) specifically the topics of Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis (400 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (375 papers) and Geometry and complex manifolds (288 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geometric and Functional Analysis are Jean Bourgain, Jeff Cheeger, W. T. Gowers, M. Gromov, Terence Tao, Michel Talagrand, Semyon Alesker, Zlil Sela, Robert J. McCann and Benson Farb.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geometric and Functional Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geometric and Functional Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geometric and Functional Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Geometric and Functional Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geometric and Functional Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geometric and Functional Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geometric and Functional Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025