Usue de la Barrera
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Inmaculada Montoya‐CastillaKonstanze SchoepsAlicia TamaritJosé‐Antonio Gil‐GómezVicente Prado‐GascóJesús Castro‐CalvoEduardo Fonseca‐PedreroLidón Villanueva
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Partner nations
- SpainMexicoUnited States
In The Last Decade
Usue de la Barrera
23 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Clinical Psychology 217
- Social Psychology 180
- Education 117
- Sociology and Political Science 110
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Usue de la Barrera
This map shows the geographic impact of Usue de la Barrera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Usue de la Barrera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Usue de la Barrera more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Usue de la Barrera
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Usue de la Barrera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Usue de la Barrera. The network helps show where Usue de la Barrera may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Usue de la Barrera
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Usue de la Barrera. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Usue de la Barrera based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Usue de la Barrera. Usue de la Barrera is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Usue de la Barrera
Usue de la Barrera is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (217 citations), Applied Psychology (52 citations) and Social Psychology (180 citations). Usue de la Barrera has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Inmaculada Montoya‐Castilla, Konstanze Schoeps, Alicia Tamarit, José‐Antonio Gil‐Gómez, Vicente Prado‐Gascó, Jesús Castro‐Calvo, Eduardo Fonseca‐Pedrero, Lidón Villanueva, Beatriz Lucas‐Molina and Alicia Pérez‐Albéniz. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.