Andrew Piper

815 total citations
50 papers, 369 citations indexed

About

Andrew Piper is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Piper has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 369 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 18 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Andrew Piper's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (13 papers), Topic Modeling (11 papers) and Computational and Text Analysis Methods (8 papers). Andrew Piper is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (13 papers), Topic Modeling (11 papers) and Computational and Text Analysis Methods (8 papers). Andrew Piper collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Andrew Piper's co-authors include Derek Ruths, David Bamman, Richard Jean So, David Jurgens, Vincent Larivière, Fei Shu, Philippe Mongeon, Olivier Toubia, Mark Algee‐Hewitt and Koustuv Sinha and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, New Media & Society and Sustainability Science.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Piper

42 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Piper Canada 10 141 111 74 56 29 50 369
Katherine Bode Australia 10 54 0.4× 143 1.3× 39 0.5× 70 1.3× 13 0.4× 31 273
Fotis Jannidis Germany 9 167 1.2× 124 1.1× 17 0.2× 53 0.9× 21 0.7× 60 357
T. Meder Netherlands 9 151 1.1× 48 0.4× 11 0.1× 46 0.8× 11 0.4× 46 258
Maria Antoniak United States 6 129 0.9× 15 0.1× 37 0.5× 42 0.8× 19 0.7× 23 239
Suma Desu United States 3 111 0.8× 21 0.2× 9 0.1× 77 1.4× 6 0.2× 4 290
Annette Hautli-Janisz Germany 9 227 1.6× 15 0.1× 11 0.1× 21 0.4× 48 1.7× 40 346
Caleb Ziems United States 8 333 2.4× 4 0.0× 50 0.7× 100 1.8× 16 0.6× 14 467
Kenneth Reinecke Hansen Denmark 6 52 0.4× 34 0.3× 7 0.1× 180 3.2× 3 0.1× 15 295
Justin Garten United States 7 110 0.8× 14 0.1× 19 0.3× 144 2.6× 3 0.1× 9 273
Jonathan Hope United Kingdom 8 49 0.3× 83 0.7× 5 0.1× 31 0.6× 11 0.4× 17 244

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Piper. The network helps show where Andrew Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Piper. Andrew Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hobson, David W., et al.. (2024). Large Scale Narrative Messaging around Climate Change: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. 143–155. 3 indexed citations
2.
3.
Antoniak, Maria, et al.. (2024). The Empirical Variability of Narrative Perceptions of Social Media Texts. 19940–19968.
4.
5.
6.
Hobson, David, et al.. (2024). Story Morals: Surfacing value-driven narrative schemas using large language models. 12998–13032. 2 indexed citations
7.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2023). MultiHATHI: A Complete Collection of Multilingual Prose Fiction in the HathiTrust Digital Library. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9. 1 indexed citations
8.
Piper, Andrew. (2023). Computational Narrative Understanding: A Big Picture Analysis. 28–39. 3 indexed citations
9.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2022). The predictability of literary translation. 155–160. 2 indexed citations
10.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2021). “Are you kidding me?”: Detecting Unpalatable Questions on Reddit. 2083–2099. 3 indexed citations
11.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Goodreads Versus Amazon: The Effect of Decoupling Book Reviewing And Book Selling. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 9(1). 602–605. 7 indexed citations
12.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Detecting Narrativity Across Long Time Scales.. 319–332.
13.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2020). Measuring the Effects of Bias in Training Data for Literary Classification. 74–84. 1 indexed citations
14.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Social Characters: The Hierarchy of Gender in Contemporary English-Language Fiction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 15 indexed citations
15.
Piper, Andrew. (2018). Enumerations. 42 indexed citations
16.
Piper, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Studying Literary Characters and Character Networks.. DH. 6 indexed citations
17.
Piper, Andrew. (2016). Fictionality. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(2). 7 indexed citations
18.
Jurgens, David, et al.. (2016). Annotating characters in literary corpora: a scheme, the CHARLES tool, and an annotated novel. Language Resources and Evaluation. 184–189. 5 indexed citations
19.
Shu, Fei, et al.. (2016). On the Evolution of Library and Information Science Doctoral Dissertation Topics in North America (1960–2013). Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 57(2). 131–142. 14 indexed citations
20.
Piper, Andrew. (2013). Reading's Refrain: From Bibliography to Topology. ELH. 80(2). 373–399. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katherine Bode Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fotis Jannidis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Meder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maria Antoniak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Suma Desu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annette Hautli-Janisz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caleb Ziems Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kenneth Reinecke Hansen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Justin Garten Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jonathan Hope
Rankless by CCL
2026