Peter Schwenger

401 citations
30 papers · 120 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Schwenger

22 papers receiving 61 citations

Peers

Peter Schwenger
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Literature and Literary Theory 62
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 13
  • Geography, Planning and Development 10
  • Classics 6
  • History 17
Replace Liedeke Plate with:
Liedeke Plate Netherlands
Colm Tóibín
Rolf J. Goebel United States
Julia M. Wright Canada
Claudia Benthien Germany
Kenneth R. Johnston United States
Lewis A. Lawson United States
Brenda R. Silver United Kingdom
Todd Kontje United States
Patrick ffrench United Kingdom
Peter Schwenger relative to Liedeke Plate Netherlands Liedeke Plate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Liedeke Plate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schwenger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schwenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schwenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schwenger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schwenger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schwenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schwenger. The network helps show where Peter Schwenger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schwenger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schwenger Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schwenger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198519
2 200117
3 199411
4 20009
5
Intermedialities: Philosophy, Arts, Politics
20108
6 19866
7 19916
8 19796
9
At the Borders of Sleep: On Liminal Literature
20125
10 19944
11 19994
12 19794
13 20023
14 20113
15 20193
16
Red Cannas, Sardine Cans, and the Gaze of the Object
20022
17 20082
18 20142
19 19911
20 19941

About Peter Schwenger

Peter Schwenger is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Political Science and International Relations and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Sound Studies and Aurality (2 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (62 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (13 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (10 citations), Classics (6 citations) and History (17 citations). Peter Schwenger has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mieke Bal, John Whittier Treat, Heinz Kimmerle, Purushottama Bilimoria, Rosi Braidotti, Hugh J. Silverman, Jean‐Luc Nancy, Rosalyn Diprose, Dorota Głowacka and Luce Irigaray. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Inquiry, SubStance, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Gothic Studies and Modern Language Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact