Ting‐Chiao Huang

674 total citations
17 papers, 374 citations indexed

About

Ting‐Chiao Huang is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ting‐Chiao Huang has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 374 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Accounting, 6 papers in Strategy and Management and 4 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Ting‐Chiao Huang's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (12 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (4 papers). Ting‐Chiao Huang is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (12 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (4 papers). Ting‐Chiao Huang collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Taiwan. Ting‐Chiao Huang's co-authors include Jeng‐Ren Chiou, Hua‐Wei Huang, Hsihui Chang, K. Raghunandan, Chih‐Chen Lee, Chen Chen, Yi‐Hung Lin, Robyn Moroney, Mehdi Khedmati and Yenn‐Ru Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Accounting Review, Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory and Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.

In The Last Decade

Ting‐Chiao Huang

16 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ting‐Chiao Huang Australia 9 342 137 59 35 31 17 374
Ahmed M. Abdel‐Meguid Egypt 9 260 0.8× 129 0.9× 57 1.0× 20 0.6× 18 0.6× 15 294
Zvi Singer Canada 11 434 1.3× 217 1.6× 109 1.8× 51 1.5× 32 1.0× 27 463
Jagadison K. Aier United States 6 462 1.4× 174 1.3× 103 1.7× 57 1.6× 34 1.1× 10 476
Charles A. Barragato United States 6 269 0.8× 129 0.9× 34 0.6× 39 1.1× 13 0.4× 9 298
Paul Tanyi United States 9 345 1.0× 136 1.0× 51 0.9× 49 1.4× 20 0.6× 21 371
Seok Woo Jeong South Korea 6 300 0.9× 187 1.4× 45 0.8× 23 0.7× 26 0.8× 27 348
Byungcherl Charlie Sohn Macao 11 414 1.2× 243 1.8× 100 1.7× 21 0.6× 50 1.6× 20 452
Ying Li Compton United States 6 405 1.2× 202 1.5× 140 2.4× 39 1.1× 26 0.8× 6 420
George W. Ruch United States 5 271 0.8× 132 1.0× 60 1.0× 30 0.9× 29 0.9× 10 300
Sandeep Nabar United States 8 270 0.8× 132 1.0× 97 1.6× 17 0.5× 35 1.1× 15 313

Countries citing papers authored by Ting‐Chiao Huang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ting‐Chiao Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ting‐Chiao Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ting‐Chiao Huang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ting‐Chiao Huang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ting‐Chiao Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ting‐Chiao Huang. The network helps show where Ting‐Chiao Huang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ting‐Chiao Huang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ting‐Chiao Huang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ting‐Chiao Huang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ting‐Chiao Huang. Ting‐Chiao Huang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Lin, Yi‐Hung & Ting‐Chiao Huang. (2023). Does Regulatory Reform of Internal Controls in China Improve Internal Control Effectiveness? Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement. Journal of International Accounting Research. 22(2). 121–147. 4 indexed citations
2.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2022). Learning from Masters: Engagement Partners’ Co-Signing Relationships with Non-Engagement Industry Specialist Partners and Audit Quality. European Accounting Review. 32(5). 1307–1339. 1 indexed citations
3.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, Chen Chen, Steven E. Kaplan, & Yi‐Hung Lin. (2022). Implications of Co-Working Experience Between Audit Partners. Current Issues in Auditing. 16(2). P51–P57.
4.
Lin, Yi‐Hung, Hua‐Wei Huang, Mai Dao, & Ting‐Chiao Huang. (2021). Does the Form 20‐F reconciliation help ensure the financial reporting quality of cross‐listed IFRS firms? A comparison with cross‐listed non‐IFRS firms. International Journal of Auditing. 25(2). 442–474. 1 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Chen, Ting‐Chiao Huang, Mukesh Garg, & Mehdi Khedmati. (2021). Governments as customers: Exploring the effects of government customers on supplier firms’ information quality. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 48(9-10). 1630–1667. 21 indexed citations
6.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2021). Analyst Revenue Forecasts and Firm Revenue Misstatements. European Accounting Review. 32(2). 379–414. 3 indexed citations
7.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, Chen Chen, Steven E. Kaplan, & Yi‐Hung Lin. (2021). Audit Partners' Co-Working Experience and Audit Outcomes. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 40(2). 133–160. 13 indexed citations
8.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2021). Does the Length of the Cooling-Off Period Affect Audit Quality?. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 41(3). 149–174. 2 indexed citations
9.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2019). Is there an association between accounting firm ranks and audit quality? An examination of the top 100 accounting firms in China. International Journal of Auditing. 23(2). 204–230. 8 indexed citations
10.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2018). Auditor Rotation and Perceived Competence and Independence: The Effect of Fees and Industry Specialization. Journal of International Accounting Research. 17(3). 153–175. 14 indexed citations
11.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, Hsihui Chang, & Jeng‐Ren Chiou. (2015). Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 35(2). 121–145. 99 indexed citations
12.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2015). Lower audit fees for women audit partners in Taiwan and why. Asia Pacific Management Review. 20(4). 219–233. 7 indexed citations
13.
Huang, Hua‐Wei, K. Raghunandan, Ting‐Chiao Huang, & Jeng‐Ren Chiou. (2014). Fee Discounting and Audit Quality Following Audit Firm and Audit Partner Changes: Chinese Evidence. The Accounting Review. 90(4). 1517–1546. 104 indexed citations
14.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, Hua‐Wei Huang, & Chih‐Chen Lee. (2014). Corporate executive’s gender and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal. 29(6). 527–547. 54 indexed citations
15.
Dao, Mai, et al.. (2014). Can Management Turnover Restore the Financial Statement Credibility of Restating Firms? Further Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 41(7-8). 893–925. 16 indexed citations
16.
Chiou, Jeng‐Ren, Yenn‐Ru Chen, & Ting‐Chiao Huang. (2010). Assets Expropriation via Cash Dividends? Free Cash Flow or Tunneling. China Journal of Accounting Research. 3. 71–93. 16 indexed citations
17.
Huang, Ting‐Chiao, et al.. (2008). Substitution, availability and preferences in earnings management: empirical evidence from China. Review of Managerial Science. 2(2). 129–160. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026