Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Do Non–Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions
20021.0k citationsMark L. DeFond, K. Raghunandan et al.profile →
Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures
2002583 citationsMarshall A. Geiger, K. RaghunandanAuditing A Journal of Practice & Theoryprofile →
The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees
2003562 citationsK. Raghunandan et al.Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theoryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by K. Raghunandan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Raghunandan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Raghunandan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Raghunandan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Raghunandan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Raghunandan. The network helps show where K. Raghunandan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Raghunandan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Raghunandan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Raghunandan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K. Raghunandan. K. Raghunandan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Raghunandan, K., et al.. (2010). Audit Fees after Remediation of Internal Control Weaknesses. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
4.
Krishnan, Jagan, K. Raghunandan, & Joon Sun Yang. (2007). Were Former Andersen Clients Treated More Leniently than Other Clients? Evidence from Going-Concern Modified Audit Opinions. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Raghunandan, K., William J. Read, & Scott Whisenant. (2005). Initial Evidence on the Association Between Non-Audit Fees and Restated Financial Statements. SSRN Electronic Journal.28 indexed citations
7.
Whisenant, Scott, Srinivasan Sankaraguruswamy, & K. Raghunandan. (2003). Evidence on the Joint Determination of Audit and Non-Audit Fees. SSRN Electronic Journal.54 indexed citations
Geiger, Marshall A. & K. Raghunandan. (2002). CONSERVATISM OF THE BIG SIX AUDIT FIRMS AND GOING-CONCERN MODIFIED AUDIT REPORTS. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies journal. 6(1). 165.1 indexed citations
10.
Raghunandan, K.. (2002). Non-audit Services and Shareholder Ratification of Auditors. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Read, William J. & K. Raghunandan. (2001). The State of Audit Committees. Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy. 191(5). 57.11 indexed citations
14.
Geiger, Marshall A. & K. Raghunandan. (2001). Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures. SSRN Electronic Journal.22 indexed citations
15.
Raghunandan, K. & Dasaratha V. Rama. (1999). Auditor Resignations and the Market for Audit Services. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Raghunandan, K., et al.. (1996). Enhancing Audit Committee Effectiveness. Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy. 182(2). 79.294 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.