This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Bates more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Bates. The network helps show where Ian Bates may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Bates
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Bates.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Bates based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Bates. Ian Bates is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2019). A Qualitative Assessment of an Education Programme for Advanced Pharmacy Practice. UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
Kopelman, P, et al.. (2016). The RPS Roadmap to Advanced Practice: Supporting the development and assessment of Advanced Practitioners, both specialist and generalist. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Shulman, Rob, et al.. (2012). Credentialing advanced level practice. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
9.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2009). Advancing and improving practice in pharmacy: Is "elitism" a dirty word?. UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
10.
Laaksonen, Raisa, Catherine Duggan, & Ian Bates. (2009). Overcoming barriers to engagement in continuing professional development in community pharmacy: A longitudinal study. UCL Discovery (University College London).16 indexed citations
11.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2005). Development of an evidence-led competency framework for primary care and community pharmacists. UCL Discovery (University College London).14 indexed citations
12.
Davies, Jonathan S., et al.. (2004). Adopting a strategy for practitioner development. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
13.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2004). Why we need a defined career structure in place of informal progession. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
14.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2004). Consultant practice - A strategy for practitioner development. UCL Discovery (University College London).4 indexed citations
15.
Davies, Gareth, et al.. (2003). Academic dishonest among pharmacy students. Investigating academic dishonesty behaviours in undergraduates. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
16.
Taylor, Kmg & Ian Bates. (2003). Pharmacy student numbers are bound to affect educational standards. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
17.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2002). A competency-based approach to fitness for practice. UCL Discovery (University College London).11 indexed citations
18.
Aggarwal, Reena, Ian Bates, Graham Davies, & Imran Ahmed Khan. (2002). A study of academic dishonesty among students at two pharmacy schools. UCL Discovery (University College London).48 indexed citations
19.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2001). An occupational survey of hospital pharmacists in the south of England. UCL Discovery (University College London).12 indexed citations
20.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (1996). Discrepancies in prescribing - Where do they occur?. UCL Discovery (University College London).13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.