Andreia Bruno

678 total citations
19 papers, 473 citations indexed

About

Andreia Bruno is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Andreia Bruno has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 473 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Andreia Bruno's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers). Andreia Bruno is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers). Andreia Bruno collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Andreia Bruno's co-authors include Ian Bates, Claire Anderson, Tina Brock, Iva Mucalo, Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić, Shirin Aliabadi, Andrew Brown, Catherine Duggan, Arit Udoh and Timothy Rennie and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Medical Education and Human Resources for Health.

In The Last Decade

Andreia Bruno

19 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andreia Bruno United Kingdom 13 307 259 158 113 69 19 473
Manal Zaidan Qatar 11 370 1.2× 158 0.6× 147 0.9× 101 0.9× 80 1.2× 27 537
T.P.G.M. de Vries Netherlands 6 232 0.8× 193 0.7× 74 0.5× 79 0.7× 55 0.8× 7 457
Jane Ferguson United Kingdom 13 107 0.3× 113 0.4× 245 1.6× 96 0.8× 41 0.6× 28 479
Henri R. Manasse United States 9 330 1.1× 93 0.4× 103 0.7× 140 1.2× 89 1.3× 60 476
Hoai-An Truong United States 12 146 0.5× 106 0.4× 122 0.8× 54 0.5× 35 0.5× 30 408
Max D. Ray United States 9 200 0.7× 87 0.3× 117 0.7× 63 0.6× 33 0.5× 31 330
Marialice S. Bennett United States 12 458 1.5× 182 0.7× 236 1.5× 72 0.6× 85 1.2× 33 609
Caitlin K. Frail United States 11 245 0.8× 149 0.6× 160 1.0× 32 0.3× 52 0.8× 25 377
Tracey Bessell Australia 9 147 0.5× 99 0.4× 268 1.7× 32 0.3× 61 0.9× 20 606
Réjean Laprise Canada 8 166 0.5× 71 0.3× 101 0.6× 58 0.5× 66 1.0× 10 412

Countries citing papers authored by Andreia Bruno

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreia Bruno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreia Bruno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreia Bruno more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreia Bruno

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreia Bruno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreia Bruno. The network helps show where Andreia Bruno may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andreia Bruno

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andreia Bruno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andreia Bruno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andreia Bruno. Andreia Bruno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Bruno, Andreia, et al.. (2022). An evidence-led review of the FIP global competency framework for early career pharmacists training and development. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 19(3). 445–456. 11 indexed citations
2.
Arakawa, Naoko, Andreia Bruno, & Ian Bates. (2020). A A Global Comparison of Initial Pharmacy Education Curricula: An Exploratory Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 18–18. 16 indexed citations
3.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2018). An analysis of the global pharmacy workforce capacity trends from 2006 to 2012. Human Resources for Health. 16(1). 3–3. 45 indexed citations
4.
Bruno, Andreia, Claire Anderson, Tina Brock, et al.. (2018). Structured Multi-Stakeholder Workshops to Advance a Global Transformative Roadmap for Pharmaceutical Workforce. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(3). 13–13. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Udoh, Arit, Andreia Bruno, Ian Bates, & Kirsten Galbraith. (2018). Transnational comparability of advanced pharmacy practice developmental frameworks: a country-level crossover mapping study. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 26(6). 550–559. 9 indexed citations
7.
Udoh, Arit, Andreia Bruno, & Ian Bates. (2018). A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries. Human Resources for Health. 16(1). 15 indexed citations
8.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2016). An analysis of the global pharmacy workforce capacity. Human Resources for Health. 14(1). 61–61. 74 indexed citations
9.
Mucalo, Iva, et al.. (2016). The Development of the Croatian Competency Framework for Pharmacists. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 80(8). 134–134. 23 indexed citations
10.
Pálsdóttir, Björg, Andreia Bruno, Hugh Barr, et al.. (2016). Training for impact: the socio-economic impact of a fit for purpose health workforce on communities. Human Resources for Health. 14(1). 49–49. 47 indexed citations
11.
Anderson, Claire, Ian Bates, Tina Brock, et al.. (2014). Highlights From the FIPEd Global Education Report. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 78(1). 4–4. 12 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Claire, Jennifer Marriott, Tina Brock, et al.. (2014). Turning the World of Pharmacy Education into a Global Community Through Sharing. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 78(7). 130–130. 5 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Using participatory action research to develop an essential medicine supply competency framework for primary health care personnel in Pacific Island Countries. International journal of nursing. 1(2). 13–24. 3 indexed citations
14.
Anderson, Claire, Ian Bates, Tina Brock, et al.. (2012). Needs-Based Education in the Context of Globalization. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 76(4). 56–56. 33 indexed citations
15.
Hadžiabdić, Maja Ortner, Iva Mucalo, Ian Bates, et al.. (2012). Individualized Education and Competency Development of Croatian Community Pharmacists Using the General Level Framework. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 76(2). 23–23. 42 indexed citations
16.
Brown, Andrew, et al.. (2012). Validated Competency Framework for Delivery of Pharmacy Services in Pacific‐Island Countries. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research. 42(4). 268–272. 14 indexed citations
17.
Hadžiabdić, Maja Ortner, Iva Mucalo, Ian Bates, et al.. (2011). Evaluation of Croatian Community Pharmacists' Patient Care Competencies Using the General Level Framework. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 75(2). 36–36. 28 indexed citations
18.
Bruno, Andreia, Ian Bates, Tina Brock, & Claire Anderson. (2010). Towards a Global Competency Framework. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74(3). 56–56. 61 indexed citations
19.
Bates, Ian & Andreia Bruno. (2008). Competence in the Global Pharmacy Workforce A discussion paper. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026