Timo Gnambs

103 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality 2024 · 97 citations
970+1Years since publication255075

Peers

Timo Gnambs
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Applied Psychology 335
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 546
  • Social Psychology 848
  • Communication 265
  • Clinical Psychology 617
Replace Sandra Matz with:
Sandra Matz United States
Yla Tausczik United States
Pengcheng Wang China
Elly A. Konijn Netherlands
Samuel Greiff Luxembourg
Gábor Orosz Hungary
Anastasia Kitsantas United States
Chuang Wang United States
Jamie Guillory United States
Joseph K. Goodman United States
Timo Gnambs relative to Sandra Matz United States Sandra Matz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Sandra Matz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timo Gnambs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Gnambs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Gnambs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Gnambs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timo Gnambs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Gnambs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Gnambs. The network helps show where Timo Gnambs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Timo Gnambs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timo Gnambs Line = papers co-authored together Timo Gnambs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014263
2 2015196
3 2019165
4 2015161
5 2018143
6 2012108
7 2012106
8
Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality
Hit paper breakdown →
202497
9 201896
10 201491
11 201781
12 202080
13 201871
14 201366
15 201766
16 201658
17 201055
18 201254
19 201750
20 202143

About Timo Gnambs

Timo Gnambs is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Education, having authored 110 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (23 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (11 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (8 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (335 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (546 citations), Social Psychology (848 citations), Communication (265 citations) and Clinical Psychology (617 citations). Timo Gnambs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Markus Appel, Kai Kaspar, Bernad Batinic, Ulrich Schroeders, Barbara Hanfstingl, Caroline Marker, Thomas Staufenbiel, Tobias Richter, Melanie C. Green and Gregory R. Maio. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Assessment, Computers in Human Behavior and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact