Tim Wharton

1.6k citations
17 papers · 565 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Wharton

15 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Tim Wharton
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Language and Linguistics 314
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 333
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 95
  • Literature and Literary Theory 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 106
Replace Simeon Floyd with:
Simeon Floyd Netherlands
Kurt Feyaerts Belgium
Filippo Domaneschi Italy
Paolo Canal Italy
Catherine Emmott United Kingdom
Beatrice Szczepek Reed United Kingdom
Javier Valenzuela Spain
Sabine Kowal United States
Roberto R. Heredia United States
Shirley Carter‐Thomas France
Tim Wharton relative to Simeon Floyd Netherlands Simeon Floyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Simeon Floyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Wharton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Wharton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Wharton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Wharton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Wharton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Wharton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Wharton. The network helps show where Tim Wharton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Tim Wharton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Wharton Line = papers co-authored together Tim Wharton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006170
2 2003108
3 200991
4 200354
5 202153
6 201523
7 202122
8 202014
9 20088
10 20108
11 20144
12 20213
13 20213
14 20193
15
The evolution of pragmatics
20061
16 20220
17 20090

About Tim Wharton

Tim Wharton is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (12 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (11 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper) and Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (314 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (333 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (95 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (106 citations). Tim Wharton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Deirdre Wilson, Caroline Jagoe, Gemma Williams, Louis de Saussure, Daniel Dukes, Steve Oswald and David Sander. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pragmatics, Pragmatics & Cognition, Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, Frontiers in Psychology and Intercultural Pragmatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact