Shirley Carter‐Thomas

814 total citations
29 papers, 416 citations indexed

About

Shirley Carter‐Thomas is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Shirley Carter‐Thomas has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 416 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 13 papers in Philosophy and 12 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Shirley Carter‐Thomas's work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (15 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (13 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers). Shirley Carter‐Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (15 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (13 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers). Shirley Carter‐Thomas collaborates with scholars based in France, China and United States. Shirley Carter‐Thomas's co-authors include Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet, Béatrice Cahour, Claire Petitmengin, Benjamin Fagard and Michel Charolles and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Pragmatics and Consciousness and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Shirley Carter‐Thomas

25 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shirley Carter‐Thomas France 9 207 162 99 55 51 29 416
Claudia Caffi Italy 6 148 0.7× 289 1.8× 192 1.9× 18 0.3× 62 1.2× 14 430
Catherine Emmott United Kingdom 9 223 1.1× 130 0.8× 292 2.9× 109 2.0× 33 0.6× 28 511
Dominic Thompson United Kingdom 10 63 0.3× 98 0.6× 158 1.6× 104 1.9× 35 0.7× 17 431
Kurt Feyaerts Belgium 13 116 0.6× 198 1.2× 352 3.6× 49 0.9× 67 1.3× 58 527
Jean‐Marc Dewaele United Kingdom 8 182 0.9× 340 2.1× 56 0.6× 35 0.6× 13 0.3× 12 506
Beatrice Szczepek Reed United Kingdom 15 154 0.7× 424 2.6× 303 3.1× 27 0.5× 22 0.4× 42 623
Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh Jordan 12 61 0.3× 220 1.4× 131 1.3× 30 0.5× 16 0.3× 91 426
Dina Abdel Salam El‐Dakhs Saudi Arabia 12 169 0.8× 241 1.5× 80 0.8× 36 0.7× 9 0.2× 81 483
Karen Sullivan Australia 9 41 0.2× 118 0.7× 208 2.1× 14 0.3× 33 0.6× 70 365
Tahereh Taherian Iran 8 123 0.6× 275 1.7× 95 1.0× 42 0.8× 31 0.6× 10 546

Countries citing papers authored by Shirley Carter‐Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shirley Carter‐Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shirley Carter‐Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shirley Carter‐Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shirley Carter‐Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shirley Carter‐Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shirley Carter‐Thomas. The network helps show where Shirley Carter‐Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shirley Carter‐Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shirley Carter‐Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shirley Carter‐Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shirley Carter‐Thomas. Shirley Carter‐Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rowley‐Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter‐Thomas. (2023). Research goes digital: A challenge for genre analysis?. ASp. 84. 15–40. 1 indexed citations
2.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2020). Three Minute Thesis presentations: Recontextualisation strategies in doctoral research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 48. 100897–100897. 41 indexed citations
3.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley, et al.. (2019). More of the same or something different? An analysis of the French discourse marker par ailleurs in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics. 156. 136–148. 4 indexed citations
4.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley, et al.. (2017). Competing influences: the impact of mode and language on verb type and density in French and English scientific discourse. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 4(1). 13–34. 1 indexed citations
5.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2016). Open science notebooks: New insights, new affordances. Journal of Pragmatics. 116. 64–76. 10 indexed citations
6.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2014). A syntactic perspective on rhetorical purpose: The example of if-conditionals in medical editorials. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
7.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley, et al.. (2014). Text structuring devices: an overview. 17–34. 1 indexed citations
8.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2013). Citation from a cross-linguistic perspective : the case of French researchers publishing in English. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 10. 111–126. 4 indexed citations
9.
Petitmengin, Claire, et al.. (2013). A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition. 22(2). 654–669. 108 indexed citations
10.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2013). Rapporter la voix de l'autre dans les articles de recherche en anglais : problèmes et enjeux pour le chercheur francophone. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 178. 163–184. 1 indexed citations
11.
Rowley‐Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter‐Thomas. (2008). When practice belies ‘theory’: Form, function and frequency of if-conditionals in specialised discourse. ASp. 53-54. 39–61. 4 indexed citations
12.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2008). If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 7(3). 191–205. 22 indexed citations
13.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley, et al.. (2005). Integrating Syntax and Pragmatics: Word Order and Transitivity Variations in Tunumiisut. International Journal of American Linguistics. 71(4). 445–472.
14.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley, et al.. (2004). Structure informationnelle et particules énonciatives : essai de typologie. L'Harmattan eBooks. 2 indexed citations
15.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2003). Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP), A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. ASp. 39-40. 59–72. 34 indexed citations
16.
Rowley‐Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter‐Thomas. (2003). Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy: Manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting. English for Specific Purposes. 24(1). 41–64. 55 indexed citations
17.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley‐Jolivet. (2001). Syntactic differences in oral and written scientific discourse: the role of information structure. ASp. 31-33. 19–37. 29 indexed citations
18.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley. (2000). La cohérence textuelle : pour une nouvelle pédagogie de l'écrit. L'Harmattan eBooks. 7 indexed citations
19.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley. (1999). Thematic networks and text types. ASp. 23-26. 139–147. 2 indexed citations
20.
Carter‐Thomas, Shirley. (1994). Langue de spécialité : cohésion, culture et cohérence. ASp. 5-6. 61–67.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026