Steve Oswald

31 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Steve Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Language and Linguistics 190
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
  • Philosophy 113
  • Literature and Literary Theory 91
  • Linguistics and Language 17
Replace Edda Weigand with:
Edda Weigand Germany
Stephen Neale United States
Claudia Bianchi Italy
Lorena Pérez Hernández Spain
Andreas Langlotz Switzerland
Elda Weizman Israel
Joanna Gavins United Kingdom
Elly Ifantidou Greece
Jacques Mœschler Switzerland
Carla Bazzanella Italy
Steve Oswald relative to Edda Weigand Germany Edda Weigand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Edda Weigand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Oswald. The network helps show where Steve Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Steve Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Oswald Line = papers co-authored together Steve Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200970
2 200848
3 201333
4 201327
5 202122
6 201820
7 201117
8 201813
9 202011
10 201310
11 20229
12
Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017
20189
13
Conspiracy and bias: argumentative features and persuasiveness of conspiracy theories
20169
14 20238
15
Trust based on bias: Cognitive constraints on source-related fallacies
20137
16 20227
17 20206
18 20195
19 20185
20 20234

About Steve Oswald

Steve Oswald is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 35 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (21 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (19 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (8 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (190 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations), Philosophy (113 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (91 citations) and Linguistics and Language (17 citations). Steve Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Poland and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Didier Maillat, Louis de Saussure, Patrick Morency, Marcin Lewiński, Sandrine Zufferey, Christopher Hart, David Sander, Tim Wharton, Daniel Dukes and Sara Greco. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pragmatics, Argumentation, Informal Logic, Languages and Discourse Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact