Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
19882.9k citationsTim ShalliceCambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
CATEGORY SPECIFIC SEMANTIC IMPAIRMENTS
19841.5k citationsTim Shallice et al.Brainprofile →
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
19911.5k citationsTim Shallice et al.Brainprofile →
Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence
2003946 citationsHugo Critchley, Christopher J. Mathias et al.Brainprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Shallice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Shallice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Shallice more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Shallice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Shallice. The network helps show where Tim Shallice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Shallice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Shallice.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Shallice based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Shallice. Tim Shallice is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Critchley, Hugo, Christopher J. Mathias, Oliver Josephs, et al.. (2003). Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. Brain. 126(10). 2139–2152.946 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Henson, Richard N., Tim Shallice, Michael D. Rugg, Paul C. Fletcher, & Raymond J. Dolan. (2001). 15. Functional imaging dissociations within right prefrontal cortex during episodic memory retrieval. UCL Discovery (University College London).5 indexed citations
10.
Shallice, Tim, et al.. (1999). Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related fMRI study. UCL Discovery (University College London).34 indexed citations
Burgess, PW & Tim Shallice. (1994). FRACTIONATION OF THE FRONTAL-LOBE SYNDROME. UCL Discovery (University College London).8 indexed citations
15.
Shallice, Tim, et al.. (1991). EFFECTS OF WORD ABSTRACTNESS IN A CONNECTIONIST MODEL OF DEEP DYSLEXIA. UCL Discovery (University College London).35 indexed citations
Shallice, Tim & Margaret Evans. (1978). The Involvement of the Frontal Lobes in Cognitive Estimation. Cortex. 14(2). 294–303.553 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Rosenhead, Jonathan, et al.. (1977). The technology of political control. Penguin Books.48 indexed citations
20.
Shallice, Tim. (1964). THE DETECTION OF CHANGE AND THE PERCEPTUAL MOMENT HYPOTHESIS. UCL Discovery (University College London).25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.