Martha J. Farah
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.02%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.05%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 0.1%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- James W. TanakaDaniel A. HackmanMark D’EspositoKimberly G. NobleGeoffrey K. AguirreSharon L. Thompson‐SchillJames L. McClellandShaun P. Vecera
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (45 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (45 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (40 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Martha J. Farah
229 papers receiving 29.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
- Cognitive Neuroscience 21.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7.5k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 5.2k
- Social Psychology 4.3k
- Clinical Psychology 3.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Martha J. Farah
This map shows the geographic impact of Martha J. Farah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martha J. Farah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martha J. Farah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martha J. Farah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martha J. Farah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martha J. Farah. The network helps show where Martha J. Farah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martha J. Farah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martha J. Farah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martha J. Farah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martha J. Farah. Martha J. Farah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 224 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Behavioral neurology & neuropsychology | 4 |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | A Superadditive-Impairment Theory of Optic Aphasia | 1 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 274 | |
| 16 | 75 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 92 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Martha J. Farah
Martha J. Farah is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 234 papers that have together received 30.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (45 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (45 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (40 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (21.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7.5k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (5.2k citations). Martha J. Farah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include James W. Tanaka, Daniel A. Hackman, Mark D’Esposito, Kimberly G. Noble, Geoffrey K. Aguirre, Sharon L. Thompson‐Schill, James L. McClelland, Shaun P. Vecera, Daniel Y. Kimberg and Bruce D. McCandliss. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.