Margaret Evans
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 1
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 1
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 10%
-
- Educational Assessment and Improvement 2
-
- Media Studies and Communication 1
-
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 1
- School Choice and Performance 1
- Education Systems and Policy 1
-
- Cognitive Science and Mapping 1
- Co-authors
- Tim ShalliceJames B. WeaverJennifer C. GreeneThomas A. SchwandtVivian L. GadsdenBonnie L. BarberScott G. ParisRebecca M. Teasdale
- Journals
- Cortex (1 paper)Journal of Educational Administration (1 paper)Educational Measurement Issues and Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Margaret Evans
5 papers receiving 581 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Cognitive Neuroscience 385
- Psychiatry and Mental health 170
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 102
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
- Statistics and Probability 41
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Evans
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Evans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Evans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Evans. The network helps show where Margaret Evans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Margaret Evans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 34 | |
| 5 | The Involvement of the Frontal Lobes in Cognitive Estimationbreakdown → | 1978 | 553 |
About Margaret Evans
Margaret Evans is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Communication and Education, having authored 5 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers), Media Studies and Communication (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (1 paper), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper) and Education Systems and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (385 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (170 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (102 citations). Margaret Evans has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tim Shallice, James B. Weaver, Jennifer C. Greene, Thomas A. Schwandt, Vivian L. Gadsden, Bonnie L. Barber, Scott G. Paris and Rebecca M. Teasdale. Their work appears in journals such as Cortex, Journal of Educational Administration, Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education and Journalism Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.