Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
19948.0k citationsKarl Friston, Chris Frith et al.profile →
Spatial registration and normalization of images
19953.2k citationsKarl Friston, Chris Frith et al.profile →
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Frith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Frith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Frith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Frith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Frith. The network helps show where Chris Frith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Frith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Frith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Frith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Frith. Chris Frith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Campbell-Meiklejohn, Daniel, Arndis Simonsen, Jørgen Scheel‐Krüger, et al.. (2012). Modulation of Social Influence by Methylphenidate. Neuropsychopharmacology. 37(6). 1517–1525.35 indexed citations
Gilbert, Sam J., Jon S. Simons, Chris Frith, & PW Burgess. (2005). The role of medial rostral prefrontal cortex in low-demand baseline conditions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 17. 88–88.1 indexed citations
5.
Frith, Chris & Uta Frith. (2005). Theory of mind. Current Biology. 15(17). R644–R645.2697 indexed citations breakdown →
Frith, Chris, et al.. (2001). Schizotypy, theory of mind and weak central coherence. UCL Discovery (University College London).7 indexed citations
10.
Macaluso, Emiliano, Chris Frith, & Jon Driver. (2001). Multisensory integration and crossmodal attention effects in the human brain - Response. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
11.
Frith, Chris, et al.. (2000). An fmri study of task-switching: Control in preparation and action.. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Dolan, Raymond J., et al.. (1998). Differential modulation of frontal cortex by diazepam during tests of episodic memory and executive function. UCL Discovery (University College London).
Paulesu, Eraldo, Matteo Signorini, Chris Frith, et al.. (1997). Functional heterogeneity of left inferior frontal cortex: Explicit behavioural and PET evidence. NeuroImage. 5.3 indexed citations
17.
Frith, Chris & Raymond J. Dolan. (1996). The role of the prefrontal cortex in higher cognitive functions. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).8 indexed citations
Fraunfelder, F. T., et al.. (1975). A simple cryosurgical unit for treatment of animal tumors.. PubMed. 70(3). 299–302.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.