Tim Ray

446 total citations
11 papers, 215 citations indexed

About

Tim Ray is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Ray has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 215 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 3 papers in Strategy and Management and 3 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Tim Ray's work include Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Tim Ray is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Tim Ray collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and Hong Kong. Tim Ray's co-authors include Stephen Little, Luke Georghiou, J. Stanley Metcalfe, Michael Gibbons, Stewart Clegg, Ikujiro Nonaka and Katsuhiro Umemoto and has published in prestigious journals such as Creativity and Innovation Management, Minerva and Prometheus.

In The Last Decade

Tim Ray

10 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tim Ray United Kingdom	6	97	50	44	41	31	11	215
S.J.M. Harkema Netherlands	5	88 0.9×	35 0.7×	36 0.8×	87 2.1×	15 0.5×	11	230
Rajesh Verma India	7	104 1.1×	39 0.8×	20 0.5×	38 0.9×	28 0.9×	31	244
Majid Ramezan Iran	8	140 1.4×	47 0.9×	62 1.4×	28 0.7×	21 0.7×	19	262
Jonathan D. Pemberton United Kingdom	4	185 1.9×	103 2.1×	73 1.7×	30 0.7×	11 0.4×	6	291
Ragna Seidler‐de Alwis Germany	4	148 1.5×	126 2.5×	43 1.0×	35 0.9×	16 0.5×	5	291
David Sewry South Africa	7	76 0.8×	65 1.3×	15 0.3×	40 1.0×	7 0.2×	10	225
Elad Harison Israel	6	97 1.0×	33 0.7×	26 0.6×	31 0.8×	27 0.9×	22	237
Stefan Gueldenberg Liechtenstein	8	147 1.5×	48 1.0×	103 2.3×	60 1.5×	20 0.6×	15	267
Annie G. Brooking United Kingdom	4	256 2.6×	81 1.6×	46 1.0×	17 0.4×	40 1.3×	7	370
Peter Gomez Switzerland	8	108 1.1×	12 0.2×	44 1.0×	28 0.7×	15 0.5×	44	219

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Ray

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Ray

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Ray. The network helps show where Tim Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Ray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Ray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Ray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Ray. Tim Ray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Ray, Tim. (2017). Why invisible boundaries matter: imagined institutions and power. Prometheus. 35(4). 1 indexed citations

2.

Ray, Tim. (2009). Rethinking Polanyi’s Concept of Tacit Knowledge: From Personal Knowing to Imagined Institutions. Minerva. 47(1). 75–92. 20 indexed citations

3.

Ray, Tim. (2008). Rethinking Michael Polanyi's Realism: From Personal Knowledge to Intersubjectively Viable Communication. Prometheus. 26(3). 3 indexed citations

4.

Ray, Tim & Stewart Clegg. (2007). Can We Make Sense of Knowledge Management’s Tangible Rainbow? A Radical Constructivist Alternative. Prometheus. 25(2). 16 indexed citations

5.

Little, Stephen & Tim Ray. (2005). Managing Knowledge: an essential reader. 2nd edition. Open Research Online (The Open University). 2 indexed citations

6.

Ray, Tim & Stephen Little. (2005). Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 96 indexed citations

7.

Clegg, Stewart & Tim Ray. (2003). Power, Rules of the Game and the Limits to Knowledge Management: Lessons from Japan and Anglo-Saxon Alarms. Prometheus. 21(1). 2 indexed citations

8.

Ray, Tim, et al.. (2001). Communication and Context: Collective Tacit Knowledge and Practice in Japan’s Workplace ba. Creativity and Innovation Management. 10(3). 154–164. 9 indexed citations

9.

Nonaka, Ikujiro, Tim Ray, & Katsuhiro Umemoto. (1998). Japanese Organizational Knowledge Creation in Anglo-American Environments. Prometheus. 16(4). 16 indexed citations

10.

Ray, Tim, et al.. (1995). JAPAN'S USE OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH TO BUILD A COMPUTER INDUSTRY: LESSONS FOR THE UK?. Prometheus. 13(1). 2 indexed citations

11.

Georghiou, Luke, et al.. (1986). Post-Innovation Performance. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact