Tim Grant
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lorraine SheridanJessica WoodhamsT. MyklebustGavin OxburghAndrew PriceCian MuldoonJohn V. ReynoldsClaire L. Donohoe
- Topics
- Authorship Attribution and Profiling (9 papers)Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers)Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tim Grant
33 papers receiving 645 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sociology and Political Science 295
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Artificial Intelligence 176
- Social Psychology 137
- Information Systems 85
Countries citing papers authored by Tim Grant
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Grant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Grant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Grant. The network helps show where Tim Grant may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Grant
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Grant. Tim Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | TXT 4N6:method, consistency, and distinctiveness in the analysis of sms text messages | 28 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 70 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | “I didn’t mean to steal someone else’s words!”:a forensic linguistic approach to detecting intentional plagiarism | 3 |
| 17 | 156 | |
| 18 | Forensic linguistics for forensic psychologists: a brief introduction | 1 |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Tim Grant
Tim Grant is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Linguistics and Language and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Authorship Attribution and Profiling (9 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Gender Studies (80 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (295 citations). Tim Grant has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine Sheridan, Jessica Woodhams, T. Myklebust, Gavin Oxburgh, Andrew Price, Cian Muldoon, John V. Reynolds, Claire L. Donohoe, Naoimh J. O’Farrell and Sinéad King. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Personality and Individual Differences and Breast Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.