William C. Thompson
About
In The Last Decade
William C. Thompson
127 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
- Molecular Biology 610
- Law 604
- Social Psychology 582
- Sociology and Political Science 464
- Cell Biology 444
Countries citing papers authored by William C. Thompson
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Thompson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Thompson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Thompson. The network helps show where William C. Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Thompson. William C. Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | How Should Forensic Scientists Present Source Conclusions | 19 |
| 6 | After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions | 5 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Forensic DNA Statistics: Still Controversial in Some Cases | 2 |
| 10 | Beyond Bad Apples: Analyzing the Role of Forensic Science in Wrongful Convictions | 22 |
| 11 | The National Research Council's Plan to Strengthen Forensic Science: Does the Path forward Run through the Courts? | 4 |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 1 The Potential for Error in Forensic DNA Testing (and How That Complicates the Use of DNA Databases for Criminal Identification) | 4 |
| 14 | Turning a Blind Eye to Misleading Scientific Testimony: Failure of Procedural Safeguards in a Capital Case | 1 |
| 15 | Evaluating and Challenging Forensic Identification Evidence | 8 |
| 16 | DNA Evidence in the O.J. Simpson Trial | 8 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | SELECTIONS TAKEN FROM SOURCE DOCUMENT ON THE ASTROGEODETIC APPROACH, THE NEW REMOTE SENSING PANORAMA, THE FIRST METHOD TO ADJUST A TRAVERSE BASED ON STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS, TH FUNCTION AND CORNER PERPETUATION | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.