Thomas R. Kwapil
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Neus Barrantes‐VidalPaul J. SilviaInez Myin‐GermeysJean P. ChapmanLoren J. ChapmanMichael J. KaneLeslie H. BrownMichael C. Zinser
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (100 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (82 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (46 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas R. Kwapil
226 papers receiving 10.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.5k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 4.1k
- Clinical Psychology 3.7k
- Philosophy 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas R. Kwapil
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. Kwapil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. Kwapil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. Kwapil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas R. Kwapil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. Kwapil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. Kwapil. The network helps show where Thomas R. Kwapil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas R. Kwapil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas R. Kwapil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas R. Kwapil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas R. Kwapil. Thomas R. Kwapil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | Clinical and Psychosocial Characterization of At-Risk Mental State and Recent Onset Psychosis Patients from an Early Psychosis Program in Barcelona (Spain). | 4 |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas R. Kwapil
Thomas R. Kwapil is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 237 papers that have together received 10.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (100 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (82 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (46 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4.5k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.8k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (4.1k citations). Thomas R. Kwapil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Neus Barrantes‐Vidal, Paul J. Silvia, Inez Myin‐Germeys, Jean P. Chapman, Loren J. Chapman, Michael J. Kane, Leslie H. Brown, Michael C. Zinser, Mark Eckblad and Georgina M. Gross. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.