Kari M. Eddington
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul J. SilviaThomas R. KwapilTimothy J. StraumanFlorin DolcosRoberto CabezaRoger E. BeatyEmily C. NusbaumMaureen Ritchey
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (15 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Kari M. Eddington
38 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 561
- Cognitive Neuroscience 392
- Clinical Psychology 268
- Social Psychology 213
- Applied Psychology 171
Countries citing papers authored by Kari M. Eddington
This map shows the geographic impact of Kari M. Eddington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kari M. Eddington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kari M. Eddington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kari M. Eddington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kari M. Eddington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kari M. Eddington. The network helps show where Kari M. Eddington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kari M. Eddington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kari M. Eddington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kari M. Eddington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kari M. Eddington. Kari M. Eddington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 217 | |
| 20 | 62 |
About Kari M. Eddington
Kari M. Eddington is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (15 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (561 citations), Applied Psychology (171 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (392 citations). Kari M. Eddington has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Silvia, Thomas R. Kwapil, Timothy J. Strauman, Florin Dolcos, Roberto Cabeza, Roger E. Beaty, Emily C. Nusbaum, Maureen Ritchey, Holly Frances Levin-Aspenson and Catherine Majestic. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.