Matt E. Meier

1.5k total citations
20 papers, 886 citations indexed

About

Matt E. Meier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Decision Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Matt E. Meier has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 886 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in General Decision Sciences. Recurrent topics in Matt E. Meier's work include Mind wandering and attention (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers). Matt E. Meier is often cited by papers focused on Mind wandering and attention (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers). Matt E. Meier collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Matt E. Meier's co-authors include Michael J. Kane, Bridget A. Smeekens, Paul J. Silvia, Thomas R. Kwapil, James M. Broadway, Randall W. Engle, Thomas S. Redick, Nash Unsworth, Charlotte A. Chun and Georgina M. Gross and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Matt E. Meier

18 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matt E. Meier United States 13 695 521 134 74 72 20 886
Christopher Draheim United States 10 400 0.6× 334 0.6× 117 0.9× 35 0.5× 71 1.0× 14 637
Shannon McGillivray United States 16 564 0.8× 262 0.5× 168 1.3× 58 0.8× 69 1.0× 23 817
Corentin Gonthier France 16 417 0.6× 346 0.7× 198 1.5× 99 1.3× 78 1.1× 47 819
Marion Rouault France 11 377 0.5× 233 0.4× 64 0.5× 105 1.4× 63 0.9× 20 603
Brittany D. McMillan United States 10 580 0.8× 389 0.7× 154 1.1× 46 0.6× 52 0.7× 11 774
Anna Pecchinenda Italy 16 696 1.0× 305 0.6× 80 0.6× 37 0.5× 228 3.2× 47 871
Wouter Boekel Netherlands 12 764 1.1× 238 0.5× 48 0.4× 35 0.5× 61 0.8× 14 943
Cody A. Mashburn United States 9 292 0.4× 244 0.5× 85 0.6× 25 0.3× 59 0.8× 14 461
William L. Kelemen United States 15 393 0.6× 217 0.4× 247 1.8× 32 0.4× 78 1.1× 24 685
Dakota R. B. Lindsey United States 5 331 0.5× 248 0.5× 91 0.7× 39 0.5× 59 0.8× 7 499

Countries citing papers authored by Matt E. Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matt E. Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt E. Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt E. Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matt E. Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt E. Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt E. Meier. The network helps show where Matt E. Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matt E. Meier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matt E. Meier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matt E. Meier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matt E. Meier. Matt E. Meier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brosowsky, Nicholaus P., et al.. (2025). Unconstrained thought as an individual-differences variable.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 1 indexed citations
2.
Welhaf, Matthew S., Matt E. Meier, & Michael J. Kane. (2025). Building a construct-valid battery of performance and self-report indicators of sustained attention consistency. Behavior Research Methods. 57(11). 306–306.
4.
Meier, Matt E., et al.. (2022). Examining the relations among working memory capacity, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomology, and conscious experience.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 11(2). 217–233. 2 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Anna, et al.. (2022). Fixation, flexibility, and creativity: The dynamics of mind wandering.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 48(7). 689–710. 15 indexed citations
6.
Welhaf, Matthew S., Matt E. Meier, Bridget A. Smeekens, et al.. (2022). A “Goldilocks zone” for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement. Behavior Research Methods. 55(1). 327–347. 16 indexed citations
7.
Meier, Matt E.. (2021). Testing the attention-distractibility trait. Memory & Cognition. 49(7). 1490–1504. 7 indexed citations
8.
Kane, Michael J., et al.. (2021). Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports. Behavior Research Methods. 53(6). 2372–2411. 58 indexed citations
9.
Welhaf, Matthew S., Bridget A. Smeekens, Matt E. Meier, et al.. (2020). The Worst Performance Rule, or the Not-Best Performance Rule? Latent-Variable Analyses of Working Memory Capacity, Mind-Wandering Propensity, and Reaction Time. Journal of Intelligence. 8(2). 25–25. 7 indexed citations
12.
Welhaf, Matthew S., Bridget A. Smeekens, Paul J. Silvia, et al.. (2019). An exploratory analysis of individual differences in mind wandering content and consistency.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 7(2). 103–125. 24 indexed citations
13.
Davis, William E., Roger Giner‐Sorolla, D. Stephen Lindsay, et al.. (2018). Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 1(4). 556–573. 14 indexed citations
14.
15.
Kane, Michael J., Georgina M. Gross, Charlotte A. Chun, et al.. (2017). For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings. Psychological Science. 28(9). 1271–1289. 153 indexed citations
16.
Meier, Matt E., Bridget A. Smeekens, Paul J. Silvia, Thomas R. Kwapil, & Michael J. Kane. (2017). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic–macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 44(1). 68–84. 25 indexed citations
17.
Kane, Michael J., Matt E. Meier, Bridget A. Smeekens, et al.. (2016). Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 145(8). 1017–1048. 127 indexed citations
18.
Meier, Matt E. & Michael J. Kane. (2015). Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus–stimulus, but not stimulus–response, conflict.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(6). 1849–1872. 17 indexed citations
19.
Meier, Matt E. & Michael J. Kane. (2012). Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: Global versus local indices of executive control.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(3). 748–759. 57 indexed citations
20.
Redick, Thomas S., James M. Broadway, Matt E. Meier, et al.. (2012). Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 28(3). 164–171. 325 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026