Thomas L. Haskell

2.2k citations
48 papers · 983 indexed · h-index 15

Thomas L. Haskell

41 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Thomas L. Haskell
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • General Psychology 33
  • History 163
  • Sociology and Political Science 447
  • History and Philosophy of Science 45
  • Marketing 74
Replace James Farr with:
James Farr United States
Burton J. Bledstein United States
Patricia Cline Cohen United States
Ellen Condliffe Lagemann United States
Charles A. Barker United States
Alan Ryan United Kingdom
Gordon S. Wood United States
Alan Swingewood United Kingdom
Melvin Richter United States
Hugh Davis Graham United States
Thomas L. Haskell relative to James Farr United States James Farr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James Farr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Haskell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Haskell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Haskell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Haskell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Haskell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Haskell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Haskell. The network helps show where Thomas L. Haskell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas L. Haskell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas L. Haskell Line = papers co-authored together Thomas L. Haskell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20234
3 20232
4
Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South: A Reply to Fogel-Engerman
20161
5 200818
6 20046
7 200041
8 200029
9 199536
10 19945
11 199312
12 199027
13 19897
14 19889
15 19870
16 19862
17 198648
18 19859
19 198523
20 197311

About Thomas L. Haskell

Thomas L. Haskell is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration and Marketing, having authored 48 papers that have together received 983 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (33 citations), History (163 citations), Sociology and Political Science (447 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations) and Marketing (74 citations). Thomas L. Haskell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David A. Hollinger, Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, Terence Ball, Paul E. Johnson, Richard F. Teichgraeber, Martin Bulmer, Thomas Bender, T. J. Jackson Lears, Michael Kämmen and Lewis Perry. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The Journal of Southern History, History and Theory and Reviews in American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026