Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kohlborn
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kohlborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kohlborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kohlborn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kohlborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kohlborn. The network helps show where Thomas Kohlborn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Kohlborn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Kohlborn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Kohlborn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Kohlborn. Thomas Kohlborn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mertens, Willem, Jan Recker, Thomas Kohlborn, & Tyge‐F. Kummer. (2016). A framework for the study of positive deviance in organizations. Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln).3 indexed citations
Beverungen, Daniel, Thomas Kohlborn, & Erwin Fielt. (2011). The morphology of service bundling settings. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
11.
Goeken, Matthias, et al.. (2011). Context Factors for Situational Service Indentification Methods. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).3 indexed citations
12.
Fielt, Erwin, Axel Korthaus, Thomas Kohlborn, & Michael Rosemann. (2010). Sourcing Business and Software Services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 190.1 indexed citations
13.
Kohlborn, Thomas, Axel Korthaus, Erwin Fielt, et al.. (2010). How Relationships can be Utilized for Service Bundling. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 457.1 indexed citations
14.
Kohlborn, Thomas, et al.. (2010). Online service delivery models - An international comparison in the public sector. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
15.
Kohlborn, Thomas, Axel Korthaus, Taizan Chan, & Michael Rosemann. (2009). Service analysis : A critical assessment of the state of the art. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1583–1594.15 indexed citations
16.
Rosemann, Michael, Erwin Fielt, Thomas Kohlborn, & Axel Korthaus. (2009). Business Service Management Whitepaper, Volume1. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).3 indexed citations
17.
Kohlborn, Thomas, Axel Korthaus, Christoph Riedl, & Helmut Krcmar. (2009). Service aggregators in business networks. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 261. 195–202.17 indexed citations
18.
Kohlborn, Thomas, Erwin Fielt, Axel Korthaus, & Michael Rosemann. (2009). Towards a Service Portfolio Management Framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.19 indexed citations
19.
Kohlborn, Thomas, Axel Korthaus, & Michael Rosemann. (2009). Business and Software Service Lifecycle Management. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 87–96.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.