Willem Mertens

773 total citations
20 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Willem Mertens is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Willem Mertens has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Management Information Systems, 7 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Willem Mertens's work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers). Willem Mertens is often cited by papers focused on Business Process Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers). Willem Mertens collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Belgium and Germany. Willem Mertens's co-authors include Jan Recker, Stijn Viaene, Peter Trkman, Theresa Schmiedel, Jan vom Brocke, Tyge‐F. Kummer, Thomas Kohlborn, Joachim Van den Bergh, Öykü Işık and Paul Gemmel and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Willem Mertens

20 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Willem Mertens Australia 10 204 123 94 65 53 20 444
Tian Ye-zhuang China 12 117 0.6× 138 1.1× 92 1.0× 56 0.9× 35 0.7× 68 364
Tsuang Kuo Taiwan 11 82 0.4× 92 0.7× 94 1.0× 42 0.6× 62 1.2× 17 350
Laura Ruiz France 8 79 0.4× 117 1.0× 69 0.7× 99 1.5× 67 1.3× 11 337
Joseph D. Fox United States 3 91 0.4× 62 0.5× 72 0.8× 82 1.3× 25 0.5× 7 423
Suliman A. El Talla Palestinian Territory 15 127 0.6× 289 2.3× 103 1.1× 100 1.5× 33 0.6× 81 639
Mehdi Kaighobadi United States 6 82 0.4× 85 0.7× 92 1.0× 72 1.1× 37 0.7× 8 381
Hong Seng Woo United Kingdom 9 235 1.2× 132 1.1× 50 0.5× 56 0.9× 55 1.0× 12 416
Roman Kmieciak Poland 10 58 0.3× 194 1.6× 154 1.6× 64 1.0× 65 1.2× 24 525
Tomás Bonavía Spain 12 407 2.0× 336 2.7× 144 1.5× 68 1.0× 37 0.7× 57 714
Stuart D. Galup United States 12 179 0.9× 99 0.8× 54 0.6× 63 1.0× 45 0.8× 27 435

Countries citing papers authored by Willem Mertens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Willem Mertens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willem Mertens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willem Mertens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Willem Mertens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willem Mertens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willem Mertens. The network helps show where Willem Mertens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Willem Mertens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Willem Mertens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Willem Mertens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Willem Mertens. Willem Mertens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mertens, Willem, et al.. (2020). New Guidelines for Null Hypothesis Significance Testing in Hypothetico-Deductive IS Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 21. 1072–1102. 19 indexed citations
2.
Mertens, Willem & Jan Recker. (2020). Can constructive deviance be empowered? A multi-level field study in Australian supermarkets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 54. 102036–102036. 7 indexed citations
3.
Mertens, Willem & Jan Recker. (2019). How store managers can empower their teams to engage in constructive deviance: Theory development through a multiple case study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 52. 101937–101937. 25 indexed citations
4.
Mertens, Willem, et al.. (2018). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly. 36(1). 11–26. 7 indexed citations
5.
Mertens, Willem & Jan Recker. (2017). Positive Deviance and Leadership: An Exploratory Field Study. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 8 indexed citations
6.
García‐Bañuelos, Luciano, Nick van Beest, Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, & Willem Mertens. (2017). Complete and Interpretable Conformance Checking of Business Processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 44(3). 262–290. 3 indexed citations
7.
Mertens, Willem, Jan Recker, Thomas Kohlborn, & Tyge‐F. Kummer. (2016). A framework for the study of positive deviance in organizations. Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln). 3 indexed citations
8.
Mertens, Willem, et al.. (2016). Quantitative Data Analysis: A Companion for Accounting and Information Systems Research. Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln). 14 indexed citations
9.
Mertens, Willem, Amedeo Pugliese, & Jan Recker. (2016). Quantitative Data Analysis. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 24 indexed citations
10.
Mertens, Willem, Jan Recker, Tyge‐F. Kummer, Thomas Kohlborn, & Stijn Viaene. (2016). Constructive deviance as a driver for performance in retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 30. 193–203. 44 indexed citations
11.
Mertens, Willem, Jan Recker, Thomas Kohlborn, & Tyge‐F. Kummer. (2016). A Framework for the Study of Positive Deviance in Organizations. Deviant Behavior. 37(11). 1288–1307. 48 indexed citations
12.
Mertens, Willem & Michael Rosemann. (2015). Digital Identity 3.0: The Platform for People. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
13.
Trkman, Peter, Willem Mertens, Stijn Viaene, & Paul Gemmel. (2015). From business process management to customer process management. Business Process Management Journal. 21(2). 250–266. 53 indexed citations
14.
Brocke, Jan vom, Theresa Schmiedel, Jan Recker, et al.. (2014). Class notes: ten principles of good business process management. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
15.
Brocke, Jan vom, Theresa Schmiedel, Jan Recker, et al.. (2014). Ten principles of good business process management. Business Process Management Journal. 20(4). 530–548. 138 indexed citations
16.
Işık, Öykü, Willem Mertens, & Joachim Van den Bergh. (2013). Practices of knowledge intensive process management: quantitative insights. Business Process Management Journal. 19(3). 515–534. 30 indexed citations
17.
Işık, Öykü, Joachim Van den Bergh, & Willem Mertens. (2012). Knowledge Intensive Business Processes: An Exploratory Study. 3817–3826. 13 indexed citations
18.
Mertens, Willem, et al.. (2011). How BPM Impacts Jobs: An Exploratory Field Study. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
19.
Mertens, Willem, et al.. (2011). How BPM Impacts Jobs: An Exploratory Field Study. 81. 1–10. 3 indexed citations
20.
Viaene, Stijn, et al.. (2010). BPM - Quo Vadis?. QUT Business School. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026