Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services
2019267 citationsIda Lindgren, Christian Østergaard Madsen et al.Government Information Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Hofmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Hofmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Hofmann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Hofmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Hofmann. The network helps show where Sara Hofmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Hofmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Hofmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Hofmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Hofmann. Sara Hofmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hofmann, Sara, et al.. (2021). A citizen-centered analysis of what public services are suitable for digital communication channels. IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
3.
Edelmann, Noella, Csaba Csáki, Sara Hofmann, et al.. (2021). Electronic Participation. Lecture notes in computer science.2 indexed citations
4.
Hofmann, Sara, Csaba Csáki, Noella Edelmann, et al.. (2020). Electronic Participation. Lecture notes in computer science.2 indexed citations
5.
Lindgren, Ida, Christian Østergaard Madsen, Sara Hofmann, & Ulf Melin. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly. 36(3). 427–436.267 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Madsen, Christian Østergaard & Sara Hofmann. (2019). Multichannel Management in the Public Sector: A Literature Review. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).10 indexed citations
Hofmann, Sara, et al.. (2018). Different But Still The Same? How Public And Private Sector Organisations Deal with New Digital Competences. 16(2).12 indexed citations
Hofmann, Sara. (2016). BECOMING FRIENDS WITH THE GOVERNMENT - A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CITIZENS’ DECISION TO ‘LIKE’ GOVERNMENT PROFILES ON FACEBOOK. European Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
11.
Hofmann, Sara. (2014). JUST BECAUSE WE CAN - GOVERNMENTS' RATIONALE FOR USING SOCIAL MEDIA. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.4 indexed citations
12.
Hofmann, Sara, et al.. (2013). Aligning Capabilities and Social Media Affordances for Open Innovation in Governments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–11.1 indexed citations
Hofmann, Sara, et al.. (2012). Adoption of Municipal e-Government Services – A Communication Problem?. Americas Conference on Information Systems.5 indexed citations
17.
Hofmann, Sara, Michael Räckers, & Jörg Becker. (2012). Identifying Factors of E-Government Acceptance – A Literature Review. International Conference on Information Systems.34 indexed citations
18.
Hofmann, Sara, Marlen Jurisch, Ralf Knackstedt, et al.. (2012). Forschung zur Prozessorientierten Verwaltung: Forschungsportalbasierte Status Quo-Analyse.1 indexed citations
19.
Becker, Jörg, Sara Hofmann, Marlen Jurisch, et al.. (2012). Prozessorientierte Verwaltung – Status quo und Forschungslücken. 61–72.5 indexed citations
20.
Hofmann, Sara, et al.. (2011). Coverage of eGovernment Security Issues in Mass Media. Lecture notes in computer science.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.