Thomas J. McCormick
- History top 5%
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 2
-
- Canadian Identity and History 3
- Chinese history and philosophy 3
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 2
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Japanese History and Culture 2
-
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 2
-
- Architecture, Modernity, and Design 1
-
- Architecture and Art History Studies 1
Thomas J. McCormick
25 papers receiving 143 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- History and Philosophy of Science 18
- Political Science and International Relations 70
- History 28
- Sociology and Political Science 86
- Cultural Studies 15
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. McCormick
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. McCormick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. McCormick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. McCormick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. McCormick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. McCormick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. McCormick. The network helps show where Thomas J. McCormick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. McCormick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Co-created e-Services: The Synthesis of a New Field of Study | 2013 | 3 |
| 2 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 58 | |
| 4 | A partial edition of Les fais des Rommains, with a study of its style and syntax : a medieval Roman history | 1995 | 2 |
| 5 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 7 | Charles-Louis Clerisseau and the Genesis of Neoclassicism | 1991 | 0 |
| 8 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1968 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1963 | 4 |
About Thomas J. McCormick
Thomas J. McCormick is a scholar working on Architecture, Museology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 27 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Architecture, Modernity, and Design (1 paper) and Architecture and Art History Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), Political Science and International Relations (70 citations) and History (28 citations). Thomas J. McCormick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Buckley, Walter LaFeber, Lloyd C. Gardner, John Κ. Fairbank, J. Garry Clifford, Paul A. Varg, Louis A. Pérez, Akira Iriye, Robert J. McMahon and Jessica C. E. Gienow‐Hecht. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.