Jay Luvaas

629 citations
29 papers · 236 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Luvaas

20 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers

Jay Luvaas
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 166
  • Space and Planetary Science 5
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 2
  • History 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 63
Replace C. P. Stacey with:
C. P. Stacey Canada
Kenneth Bourne United Kingdom
Wesley Frank Craven United States
Richard W. Leopold United States
Esmonde M. Robertson
Mark A. Stoler United States
Allan K. Wildman United States
George O. Kent United States
William G. Hyland United States
John Shy United States
Jay Luvaas relative to C. P. Stacey Canada C. P. Stacey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. P. Stacey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Luvaas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Luvaas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Luvaas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Luvaas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Luvaas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Luvaas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Luvaas. The network helps show where Jay Luvaas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jay Luvaas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Luvaas Line = papers co-authored together Jay Luvaas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974150
2 196517
3 196015
4
Frederick the Great on the Art of War
196610
5 19647
6 19654
7 19734
8 19604
9 19863
10
Liddell Hart and the Mearsheimer Critique: A "Pupil's" Retrospective
19903
11 19992
12 19992
13 19622
14 19861
15 19621
16 19581
17 19601
18 19881
19 19671
20 19821

About Jay Luvaas

Jay Luvaas is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (10 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers), European Political History Analysis (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Canadian Identity and History (3 papers), Military, Security, and Education Studies (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (166 citations), Space and Planetary Science (5 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations), History (17 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (63 citations). Jay Luvaas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Russell F. Weigley, Francis L. Loewenheim, Robin Higham, D. Clayton James, Eliot A. Cohen, Owen Connelly and Richard A. Preston. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review, Journal of Strategic Studies, The William and Mary Quarterly and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact